» Articles » PMID: 22238098

Why Do Axons Differ in Caliber?

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Jan 13
PMID 22238098
Citations 149
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

CNS axons differ in diameter (d) by nearly 100-fold (∼0.1-10 μm); therefore, they differ in cross-sectional area (d(2)) and volume by nearly 10,000-fold. If, as found for optic nerve, mitochondrial volume fraction is constant with axon diameter, energy capacity would rise with axon volume, also as d(2). We asked, given constraints on space and energy, what functional requirements set an axon's diameter? Surveying 16 fiber groups spanning nearly the full range of diameters in five species (guinea pig, rat, monkey, locust, octopus), we found the following: (1) thin axons are most numerous; (2) mean firing frequencies, estimated for nine of the identified axon classes, are low for thin fibers and high for thick ones, ranging from ∼1 to >100 Hz; (3) a tract's distribution of fiber diameters, whether narrow or broad, and whether symmetric or skewed, reflects heterogeneity of information rates conveyed by its individual fibers; and (4) mitochondrial volume/axon length rises ≥d(2). To explain the pressure toward thin diameters, we note an established law of diminishing returns: an axon, to double its information rate, must more than double its firing rate. Since diameter is apparently linear with firing rate, doubling information rate would more than quadruple an axon's volume and energy use. Thicker axons may be needed to encode features that cannot be efficiently decoded if their information is spread over several low-rate channels. Thus, information rate may be the main variable that sets axon caliber, with axons constrained to deliver information at the lowest acceptable rate.

Citing Articles

Multiplexed fiber meta-tip-based circular polarimetry for label-free pathological analysis of ischemic stroke.

Luan W, Song Q, Cheng Q, Chen C, Yu X Neurophotonics. 2025; 12(1):015012.

PMID: 40060333 PMC: 11888776. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.12.1.015012.


Axonal pathology differentially affects human Purkinje cell subtypes in the essential tremor cerebellum.

Widner J, Faust P, Louis E, Fujita H bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39974874 PMC: 11838201. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.26.633063.


Enhanced multiscale human brain imaging by semi-supervised digital staining and serial sectioning optical coherence tomography.

Cheng S, Chang S, Li Y, Novoseltseva A, Lin S, Wu Y Light Sci Appl. 2025; 14(1):57.

PMID: 39833166 PMC: 11746934. DOI: 10.1038/s41377-024-01658-0.


Developmental axon diameter growth of central nervous system axons does not depend on ensheathment or myelination by oligodendrocytes.

Bin J, Emberley K, Buscham T, Eichel-Vogel M, Doan R, Steyer A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39829751 PMC: 11741303. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.10.632348.


Caliber of zebrafish touch-sensory axons is dynamic in vivo.

Ching K, Sagasti A bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39713467 PMC: 11661087. DOI: 10.1101/2024.12.04.626901.


References
1.
Duchamp-Viret P, Chaput M, Duchamp A . Odor response properties of rat olfactory receptor neurons. Science. 1999; 284(5423):2171-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.284.5423.2171. View

2.
Baker M, Edgley S . Non-uniform olivocerebellar conduction time in the vermis of the rat cerebellum. J Physiol. 2005; 570(Pt 3):501-6. PMC: 1479875. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.099176. View

3.
ROEDER K . Organization of the ascending giant fiber system in the cockroach, Periplaneta americana. J Exp Zool. 1948; 108(2):243-61. DOI: 10.1002/jez.1401080205. View

4.
Palkovits M, Magyar P, SZENTAGOTHAI J . Quantitative histological analysis of the cerebellar cortex in the cat. IV. Mossy fiber-Purkinje cell numerical transfer. Brain Res. 1972; 45(1):15-29. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(72)90213-2. View

5.
Sterling P, Freed M . How robust is a neural circuit?. Vis Neurosci. 2007; 24(4):563-71. DOI: 10.1017/S0952523807070526. View