Deviation Scores: An Innovative Approach to Interpreting Cognitive Test Results for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities

Overview

Journal J Appl Res Intellect Disabil

Date 2023 Aug 9

PMID 37553958

Authors

Devadrita Talapatra

Laurel Snider

Jeanine Coleman

Talia Thompson

Jessica S Reinhardt

David Hessl

Karen Riley

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Students with Intellectual Disability undergo frequent cognitive testing. Testing with this population is limited by insensitivity to relative strengths and weaknesses due to floor effects.

Aim: The study explored the utility of deviation scores via four case studies as a supplement to educational decision-making.

Methods: Four students with Intellectual Disability completed cognitive testing. Deviation scores were calculated using age dependent raw z-score transformations to determine deviation from the standardization sample norms.

Results: The application of deviation scores highlighted true relative strengths and weaknesses for students with Intellectual Disability rather than documenting previously known deficits. The four cases studies illustrated where deviation scores could, or could not, add value above and beyond traditional scoring.

Discussion: Deviation scores can supplement placement and service decisions for students. Practical and psychometric considerations are reviewed.

Conclusion: The findings highlight the usefulness of deviation scores in providing meaningful information to school- and clinic-based practitioners.

References

Rizzolo M, Friedman C, Lulinski-Norris A, Braddock D . Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) waivers: a nationwide study of the states. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013; 51(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1352/1934-9556-51.01.001. View

Sansone S, Schneider A, Bickel E, Berry-Kravis E, Prescott C, Hessl D . Improving IQ measurement in intellectual disabilities using true deviation from population norms. J Neurodev Disord. 2015; 6(1):16. PMC: 4613563. DOI: 10.1186/1866-1955-6-16. View

Tager-Flusberg H, Kasari C . Minimally verbal school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder: the neglected end of the spectrum. Autism Res. 2013; 6(6):468-78. PMC: 3869868. DOI: 10.1002/aur.1329. View

Matson J, Williams L . Depression and mood disorders among persons with autism spectrum disorders. Res Dev Disabil. 2014; 35(9):2003-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.04.020. View

Hessl D, Sansone S, Berry-Kravis E, Riley K, Widaman K, Abbeduto L . The NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery for intellectual disabilities: three preliminary studies and future directions. J Neurodev Disord. 2016; 8(1):35. PMC: 5012003. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-016-9167-4. View

Simonoff E, Pickles A, Charman T, Chandler S, Loucas T, Baird G . Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008; 47(8):921-9. DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e318179964f. View

Maulik P, Mascarenhas M, Mathers C, Dua T, Saxena S . Prevalence of intellectual disability: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. Res Dev Disabil. 2011; 32(2):419-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.12.018. View

Crane L, Chester J, Goddard L, Henry L, Hill E . Experiences of autism diagnosis: A survey of over 1000 parents in the United Kingdom. Autism. 2015; 20(2):153-62. DOI: 10.1177/1362361315573636. View

Martorell A, Tsakanikos E, Pereda A, Gutierrez-Recacha P, Bouras N, Ayuso-Mateos J . Mental health in adults with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities: the role of recent life events and traumatic experiences across the life span. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009; 197(3):182-6. DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181923c8c. View

10.

Budimirovic D, Berry-Kravis E, Erickson C, Hall S, Hessl D, Reiss A . Updated report on tools to measure outcomes of clinical trials in fragile X syndrome. J Neurodev Disord. 2017; 9:14. PMC: 5467057. DOI: 10.1186/s11689-017-9193-x. View

11.

Manohar H, Subramanian K, Kandasamy P, Penchilaiya V, Arun A . Diagnostic Masking and Overshadowing in Intellectual Disability-How Structured Evaluation Helps. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs. 2016; 29(4):171-176. DOI: 10.1111/jcap.12160. View

12.

Duckworth A, Quinn P, Lynam D, Loeber R, Stouthamer-Loeber M . Role of test motivation in intelligence testing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(19):7716-20. PMC: 3093513. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018601108. View

13.

Schworer E, Hoffman E, Esbensen A . Psychometric Evaluation of Social Cognition and Behavior Measures in Children and Adolescents with Down Syndrome. Brain Sci. 2021; 11(7). PMC: 8301941. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11070836. View

14.

Lee J, Hwang H, Kim S, Kim K, Choi J, Woo M . Chromosomal Microarray With Clinical Diagnostic Utility in Children With Developmental Delay or Intellectual Disability. Ann Lab Med. 2018; 38(5):473-480. PMC: 5973923. DOI: 10.3343/alm.2018.38.5.473. View

15.

Bramlett M, Blumberg S, Ormson A, George J, Williams K, Frasier A . Design and operation of the National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs, 2009-2010. Vital Health Stat 1. 2014; (57):1-271. View

16.

Ralston M, Fuerst D, Rourke B . Comparison of the psychosocial typology of children with below average IQ to that of children with learning disabilities. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003; 25(2):255-73. DOI: 10.1076/jcen.25.2.255.13645. View

17.

Smith L, Greenberg J, Mailick M . Adults with autism: outcomes, family effects, and the multi-family group psychoeducation model. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2012; 14(6):732-8. PMC: 3492520. DOI: 10.1007/s11920-012-0328-1. View

18.

Toffalini E, Buono S, Zagaria T, Calcagni A, Cornoldi C . Using Z and age-equivalent scores to address WISC-IV floor effects for children with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2019; 63(6):528-538. DOI: 10.1111/jir.12589. View

19.

Thompson T, Coleman J, Riley K, Snider L, Howard L, Sansone S . Standardized Assessment Accommodations for Individuals with Intellectual Disability. Contemp Sch Psychol. 2018; 22(4):443-457. PMC: 6226246. DOI: 10.1007/s40688-018-0171-4. View