» Articles » PMID: 37552923

Open Surgical Retrieval of Intra-uterine Contraceptive Device Perforating the Ileum: A Case Report

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Aug 8
PMID 37552923
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction And Importance: Intra-uterine contraceptive devices (IUCDs) are globally acknowledged for their high utilization and tolerability as contraceptive techniques. However, the uncommon but critical complication of IUCD perforation and migration into the gastrointestinal (GI) system necessitates careful consideration.

Case Presentation: We present a case of IUCD migration culminating in ileal perforation in a 30-year-old female. The patient, with a history of IUCD insertion four years prior, manifested persistent abdominal discomfort lasting for a period of six months. Computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen disclosed the presence of an extraneous object perforating the uterine wall and penetrating the ileum. Surgical intervention substantiated the diagnosis, encompassing the removal of the IUCD and subsequent suturing to amend the bowel wall defect. The patient's post-operative recovery proceeded without additional complications.

Clinical Discussion: Migration and GI perforation of the IUCD are uncommon complications, and require immediate attention and proper management. When there is a suspicion of a missing IUCD, obtaining radiologic confirmation and timely removal is crucial.

Conclusion: In females of reproductive age, persistent abdominopelvic pain warrants an evaluation of their IUCD placement history and a thorough examination. If the IUCD string is not visible, further radiological investigation is mandated. Any delay in diagnosis and the ensuing treatment may lead to significant, potentially catastrophic, organ damage.

Citing Articles

Removal of Complete Spontaneous Migration of an Intrauterine Contraceptive Device to the Bladder by Cystoscopy.

Saputra A, Rahman M, Widyasari A Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 2024:6934178.

PMID: 38770062 PMC: 11105948. DOI: 10.1155/2024/6934178.

References
1.
Koh A . Neglected Intrauterine Device Migration Complications: Case Reports. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2023; 4(1):11-18. PMC: 9883666. DOI: 10.1089/whr.2022.0099. View

2.
Kho K, Chamsy D . Perforated intraperitoneal intrauterine contraceptive devices: diagnosis, management, and clinical outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21(4):596-601. PMC: 6661232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.123. View

3.
Tabatabaei F, Masoumzadeh M . Dislocated intrauterine devices: clinical presentations, diagnosis and management. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2021; 26(2):160-166. DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2021.1874337. View

4.
Alharbi K, Filimban H, Bafageeh S, Binaqeel A, Bayzid M, Brasha N . Removal of a Migrated Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Perforating the Terminal Ileum: A Case Report. Cureus. 2022; 14(9):e29748. PMC: 9621717. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29748. View

5.
Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell D . Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2018; 7:19-32. PMC: 5683155. DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546. View