» Articles » PMID: 37535276

Combined Femoral and Tibial Component Total Knee Arthroplasty Device Rotation Measurement is Reliable and Predicts Clinical Outcome

Overview
Date 2023 Aug 3
PMID 37535276
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The optimal total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rotational alignment and how best to obtain and measure it are debatable. The aim was to analyse the reliability of the Berger femoral, three different tibial and four different combined two-dimensional computer tomography (2D-CT) TKA component rotation measurements, and to ascertain which rotational values best predict a successful clinical outcome.

Methods: The 2D-CT scans were obtained post-operatively on 60 patients who had TKA. We determined one femoral [Berger's femoral angle (BFA)], three tibial [Berger's tibial angle (BTA), anatomical tibial angle (ATA) and bimalleolar posterior tibial component angle (BM_PTCA)] and four combined [transepicondylar posterior tibial component angle (TE_PTCA), bicondylar posterior tibial component angle (BC_PTCA, transepicondylar bimalleolar angle (TE_BM) and bicondylar bimalleolar angle (BC_BM)] TKA rotation angles. We made all measures in 23 patients twice by three observers and determined inter- and intra-observer agreement using the Bland-Altman plot method. We analysed measures of 55 patients using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis to ascertain the discriminative capacity of BFA, ATA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA for predicting a successful clinical outcome according to the Knee Society Score (KSS) threshold.

Results: ATA showed the smaller inter- and intra-observer average of differences (-0.1° and 1.6°, respectively) of the studied methods followed by BFA (-0.9° and 1.4°), TE_PTCA (-2.1° and 2.7°) and BC_PTCA (-0.5° and 1.8°). BFA (-4° to 2.1° and -6.1° to 8.8°) and BC_PTCA (-4.4° to 3.4° and -7.9° to 4.4°) showed the narrower inter- and intra-observer limits of agreement. A TKA device rotation (BC_PTCA) < 0.8° of external rotation (ER) predicted a KSS and KSS knee successful outcome, and < 3.8° ER for KSS functional (AUC = 0.889; 0.907 and 0.764, respectively). BFA and ATA < 0.9° ER and < 3.9° internal rotation (IR) predicted a successful KSS knee outcome (AUC = 0.796 and 0.889, respectively).

Conclusion: The ATA tibial component rotation measurement was the most reliable of those studied. BFA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA were reliable measures for TKA femoral and combined rotation. The presence of a minimal rotation between the TKA components (BC_PTCA) and a small femoral ER or tibial IR predicted a successful KSS outcome.

Level Of Evidence Ii:

Citing Articles

Comparison between ligament balancing and measured resection in robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a 2-year follow up cohort study.

Yu M, Yang X, Xu Y, Zhu W, Peng H, Lin J BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):152.

PMID: 39953453 PMC: 11827435. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08388-3.


Functional alignment in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Migliorini F, Pilone M, Schafer L, Simeone F, Bell A, Maffulli N Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(4):1741-1749.

PMID: 38337093 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-05195-0.


Level I of evidence does not support manual lymphatic drainage for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Migliorini F, Schafer L, Bertini F, Memminger M, Simeone F, Giorgino R Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22024.

PMID: 38086979 PMC: 10716409. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-49291-y.


Fostering Excellence in Knee Arthroplasty: Developing Optimal Patient Care Pathways and Inspiring Knowledge Transfer of Advanced Surgical Techniques.

Migliorini F, Feierabend M, Hofmann U J Healthc Leadersh. 2023; 15:327-338.

PMID: 38020721 PMC: 10676205. DOI: 10.2147/JHL.S383916.

References
1.
Pagoti R, OBrien S, Doran E, Beverland D . Unconstrained total knee arthroplasty in significant valgus deformity: a modified surgical technique to balance the knee and avoid instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 25(9):2825-2834. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3881-4. View

2.
Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen M, Husted H, Troelsen A . What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?. Acta Orthop. 2014; 85(5):480-7. PMC: 4164865. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.940573. View

3.
Victor J, Hoste D . Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (428):131-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000147710.69612.76. View

4.
Konigsberg B, Hess R, Hartman C, Smith L, Garvin K . Inter- and intraobserver reliability of two-dimensional CT scan for total knee arthroplasty component malrotation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 472(1):212-7. PMC: 3889411. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3111-7. View

5.
Haynes S, Lawler P . An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation. Anaesthesia. 1995; 50(3):195-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb04554.x. View