Non-invasive Measurement of the Viscoelasticity of the Optic Nerve and Sclera for Assessing Papilledema: A Pilot Clinical Study

Overview

Journal Ultrasound Med Biol

Specialty Radiology

Date 2023 Jul 30

PMID 37517885

Authors

Ngoc Thang Bui

Arash Kazemi

Arthur J Sit

Nicholas B Larson

James Greenleaf

John J Chen

Xiaoming Zhang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate our novel ultrasound vibro-elastography (UVE) technique for assessing patients with papilledema by non-invasively measuring shear wave speed (SWS), elasticity and viscosity properties of the optic nerve and sclera.

Methods: Shear wave speeds were measured at three frequencies-100, 150 and 200 Hz-on the optic nerve and sclera tissues for assessing patients with papilledema resulting from idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). The method was evaluated in six papilledema patients and six controls on two separate locations for each participant (i.e., optic nerve and posterior sclera). SWSs of the optic nerve and sclera were analyzed by using a 2-D speed map technique within a circular region of interest (ROI) (i.e., the diameter of the ROI was 1.5 mm × 3.0 mm at the optic nerve and sclera, respectively). Elasticity and viscosity were then analyzed using the wave speed dispersion over the three frequencies.

Results: We measured values of SWS at both locations, optic nerve and sclera, of the right eye and left eye at three different frequencies in IIH patients and controls. The SWS (mean ± standard deviation [m/s]) of the right eye was significantly higher at the sclera in IIH patients compared with controls (i.e., patients vs. controls: 5.91 ± 0.54 vs. 3.86 ± 0.56, p < 0.0001 at 100 Hz), but there was no significant difference at the optic nerve (i.e., patients vs. controls: 3.62 ± 0.39 vs. 3.36 ± 0.35, p = 0.1100 at 100Hz). We observed increased elasticity (kPa) in IIH patients, indicating there are significant differences in elasticity between patients and controls at the optic nerve and sclera (i.e., right eye [patients vs. controls]: 14.42 ± 6.59 vs. 6.5 ± 5.71, p = 0.0065 [optic nerve]; 33.04 ± 10.62 vs. 9.16 ± 7.15, p < 0.0001 [sclera]). Viscosity was also (Pa·s) higher in the sclera and optic nerve of the left eye (i.e., left eye [patient vs. control]: 8.89 ± 4.37 vs. 7.27 ± 5.01, p = 0.3790 (optic nerve); 16.05 ± 10.79 vs. 8.49 ± 6.09, p < 0.0194 [sclera]).

Conclusion: This research illustrates the feasibility of using our UVE system to evaluate stiffness of different tissues in the eye non-invasively. It suggests that the viscoelasticity of the posterior sclera is higher than that of the optic nerve. We found that the posterior sclera is stiffer than the optic nerve in patients with papilledema resulting from IIH, making UVE a potential non-invasive technique for assessing papilledema.

References

Maresca D, Correia M, Villemain O, Bize A, Sambin L, Tanter M . Noninvasive Imaging of the Coronary Vasculature Using Ultrafast Ultrasound. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 11(6):798-808. PMC: 5784807. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.05.021. View

Zhang X, Zhang A, Zhou B, Xu X . A feasibility study for noninvasive measurement of shear wave speed in live zebrafish. Ultrasonics. 2020; 107:106170. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106170. View

Deng Y, Rouze N, Palmeri M, Nightingale K . Ultrasonic Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging Sequencing and Data Processing Using a Verasonics Research Scanner. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017; 64(1):164-176. PMC: 5266610. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2614944. View

Neumann E, Owings T, Erdemir A . Regional variations of in vivo surface stiffness of soft tissue layers of musculoskeletal extremities. J Biomech. 2019; 95:109307. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.08.001. View

Pardon L, Harwerth R, Patel N . Neuroretinal rim response to transient changes in intraocular pressure in healthy non-human primate eyes. Exp Eye Res. 2020; 193:107978. PMC: 7113098. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.107978. View

Chen J, Wall M . Epidemiology and risk factors for idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2013; 54(1):1-11. PMC: 3864361. DOI: 10.1097/IIO.0b013e3182aabf11. View

Li D, Xu H, Liu B, Bo X, Li X, Wu R . Quality Measurement of Two-dimensional Shear Wave Speed Imaging for Breast Lesions: the Associated Factors and the Impact to Diagnostic Performance. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):5076. PMC: 5506023. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-05281-5. View

Sichitiu J, Meuwly J, Baud D, Desseauve D . Using shear wave elastography to assess uterine tonicity after vaginal delivery. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10420. PMC: 8129155. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89756-6. View

Abou Karam M, Mukhina E, Daras N, Rivals I, Pillet H, Skalli W . Reliability of B-mode ultrasound and shear wave elastography in evaluating sacral bone and soft tissue characteristics in young adults with clinical feasibility in elderly. J Tissue Viability. 2022; 31(2):245-254. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2022.02.003. View

10.

Zhang X, Zhou B, Kopecky S, Trost L . Two dimensional penile ultrasound vibro-elastography for measuring penile tissue viscoelasticity: A pilot patient study and its correlation with penile ultrasonography. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020; 103:103570. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103570. View

11.

Qian X, Li R, Lu G, Jiang L, Kang H, Shung K . Ultrasonic elastography to assess biomechanical properties of the optic nerve head and peripapillary sclera of the eye. Ultrasonics. 2020; 110:106263. PMC: 7736296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106263. View

12.

Zhang X, Osborn T, Kalra S . A noninvasive ultrasound elastography technique for measuring surface waves on the lung. Ultrasonics. 2016; 71:183-188. PMC: 4980235. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.06.012. View

13.

Amioka N, Takaya Y, Nakamura K, Kondo M, Akazawa K, Ohno Y . Impact of shear wave dispersion slope analysis for assessing the severity of myocarditis. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):8776. PMC: 9130270. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12935-6. View

14.

Deffieux T, Gennisson J, Bousquet L, Corouge M, Cosconea S, Amroun D . Investigating liver stiffness and viscosity for fibrosis, steatosis and activity staging using shear wave elastography. J Hepatol. 2014; 62(2):317-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.09.020. View

15.

Navindaran K, Kang J, Moon K . Techniques for characterizing mechanical properties of soft tissues. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2022; 138:105575. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105575. View

16.

Beuve S, Kritly L, Calle S, Remenieras J . Diffuse shear wave spectroscopy for soft tissue viscoelastic characterization. Ultrasonics. 2020; 110:106239. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106239. View

17.

Dai W, Xu J, Yu B, Chen L, Chen Y, Zhan J . Correlation of Stiffness of Prostate Cancer Measured by Shear Wave Elastography with Grade Group: A Preliminary Study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020; 47(2):288-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.10.018. View

18.

Takaya Y, Nakamura K, Nakayama R, Ohtsuka H, Amioka N, Kondo M . Efficacy of shear wave elasticity for evaluating myocardial hypertrophy in hypertensive rats. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):22812. PMC: 8613270. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-02271-6. View

19.

Xie J, Donaldson L, Margolin E . Papilledema: A review of etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Surv Ophthalmol. 2021; 67(4):1135-1159. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.11.007. View

20.

Cui Y, He N, Ye X, Hu L, Xie L, Zhong W . Evaluation of Tissue Stiffness Around Lesions by Sound Touch Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Malignancy Diagnosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2022; 48(8):1672-1680. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.04.219. View