» Articles » PMID: 35672199

Evaluation of Tissue Stiffness Around Lesions by Sound Touch Shear Wave Elastography in Breast Malignancy Diagnosis

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Jun 7
PMID 35672199
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the study described here was to assess the evaluation of tissue stiffness around lesions by sound touch shear wave elastography (STE) in breast malignancy diagnosis. This was an institutional ethics committee-approved, single-center study. A total of 90 women with breast masses examined with conventional ultrasound and STE were eligible for enrollment from December 2020 to July 2021. The maximum and mean elastic values of masses, E and E, were determined. Shell function was used to measure the maximum and mean elastic values of tissues around masses in annular shells 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mm wide, recorded as corresponding E and E. All parameters were analyzed and compared with histopathologic results. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess diagnostic performance. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the best diagnostic model. Collagen fiber content of tissues around breast lesions was evaluated using Masson staining and ImageJ software. Ninety women with breast masses were included in this study; 50 had benign (mean diameter 15.84 ± 4.39 mm) and 40 had malignant (mean diameter 17.40 ± 5.42 mm) masses. The diagnostic value of E was the highest (area under the curve = 0.930) with a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 88%. According to stepwise logistic regression analysis, E and age were independent predictors of malignancy. E was also found to be highly correlated with the collagen fiber content of tissue in the malignant group (r = 0.877). Tissue stiffness around lesions measured by STE is a useful metric in identifying malignant breast masses by reflecting collagen fiber content, and E performs best.

Citing Articles

Predicting hepatocellular carcinoma: A new non-invasive model based on shear wave elastography.

Jiang D, Qian Y, Gu Y, Wang R, Yu H, Dong H World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(25):3166-3178.

PMID: 39006386 PMC: 11238667. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i25.3166.


Non-invasive Measurement of the Viscoelasticity of the Optic Nerve and Sclera for Assessing Papilledema: A Pilot Clinical Study.

Bui N, Kazemi A, Sit A, Larson N, Greenleaf J, Chen J Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023; 49(10):2227-2233.

PMID: 37517885 PMC: 10529623. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.07.006.


Diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound elastography and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR in benign and malignant breast masses.

Tao Z, Qi H, Ma Y Am J Transl Res. 2023; 15(4):2870-2877.

PMID: 37193163 PMC: 10182532.


Convolutional neural network based on automatic segmentation of peritumoral shear-wave elastography images for predicting breast cancer.

Xie L, Liu Z, Pei C, Liu X, Cui Y, He N Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1099650.

PMID: 36865812 PMC: 9970986. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1099650.


Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound synchronized with shear wave elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: a diagnostic test.

He H, Wu X, Jiang M, Xu Z, Zhang X, Pan J Gland Surg. 2023; 12(1):54-66.

PMID: 36761482 PMC: 9906099. DOI: 10.21037/gs-22-684.