» Articles » PMID: 37492785

Liquid Biopsies for Cancer: From Bench to Clinic

Overview
Journal MedComm (2020)
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Jul 26
PMID 37492785
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Over the past two decades, liquid biopsy has been increasingly used as a supplement, or even, a replacement to the traditional biopsy in clinical oncological practice, due to its noninvasive and early detectable properties. The detections can be based on a variety of features extracted from tumor‑derived entities, such as quantitative alterations, genetic changes, and epigenetic aberrations, and so on. So far, the clinical applications of cancer liquid biopsy mainly aimed at two aspects, prediction (early diagnosis, prognosis and recurrent evaluation, therapeutic response monitoring, etc.) and intervention. In spite of the rapid development and great contributions achieved, cancer liquid biopsy is still a field under investigation and deserves more clinical practice. To better open up future work, here we systematically reviewed and compared the latest progress of the most widely recognized circulating components, including circulating tumor cells, cell-free circulating DNA, noncoding RNA, and nucleosomes, from their discovery histories to clinical values. According to the features applied, we particularly divided the contents into two parts, beyond epigenetics and epigenetic-based. The latter was considered as the highlight along with a brief overview of the advances in both experimental and bioinformatic approaches, due to its unique advantages and relatively lack of documentation.

Citing Articles

Beyond traditional biopsies: the emerging role of ctDNA and MRD on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Sabit H, Attia M, Mohamed N, Taha P, Ahmed N, Osama S Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):271.

PMID: 40050490 PMC: 11885725. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01940-6.


Unlocking the promise of liquid biopsies in precision oncology.

Pando-Caciano A, Trivedi R, Pauwels J, Nowakowska J, Cavina B, Falkman L J Liq Biopsy. 2025; 3:100151.

PMID: 40026562 PMC: 11863887. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100151.


From Local to Systemic: The Journey of Tick Bite Biomarkers in Australian Patients.

Lee W, Barbosa A, Lee A, Currie A, Martino D, Stenos J Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40003986 PMC: 11855657. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041520.


Liquid biopsy in cancer current: status, challenges and future prospects.

Ma L, Guo H, Zhao Y, Liu Z, Wang C, Bu J Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024; 9(1):336.

PMID: 39617822 PMC: 11609310. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-024-02021-w.


Liquid biopsy for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of melanoma.

Slusher N, Jones N, Nonaka T Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1420360.

PMID: 39156972 PMC: 11327088. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1420360.


References
1.
Cristofanilli M, Budd G, Ellis M, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller M . Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(8):781-91. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040766. View

2.
Aceto N, Bardia A, Miyamoto D, Donaldson M, Wittner B, Spencer J . Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis. Cell. 2014; 158(5):1110-1122. PMC: 4149753. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.013. View

3.
Newcomb L, Zheng Y, Faino A, Bianchi-Frias D, Cooperberg M, Brown M . Performance of PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG urinary biomarkers in prediction of biopsy outcome in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study (PASS). Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019; 22(3):438-445. PMC: 6642858. DOI: 10.1038/s41391-018-0124-z. View

4.
DAlterio C, Scala S, Sozzi G, Roz L, Bertolini G . Paradoxical effects of chemotherapy on tumor relapse and metastasis promotion. Semin Cancer Biol. 2019; 60:351-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.019. View

5.
Zhu W, Zhou K, Zha Y, Chen D, He J, Ma H . Diagnostic Value of Serum miR-182, miR-183, miR-210, and miR-126 Levels in Patients with Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. PLoS One. 2016; 11(4):e0153046. PMC: 4836744. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153046. View