» Articles » PMID: 37488510

Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Based on Multimodal Data: a Multicenter Study

Abstract

Background: The introduction of multiparameter MRI and novel biomarkers has greatly improved the prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, decision-making regarding prostate biopsy and prebiopsy examinations is still difficult. We aimed to establish a quick and economic tool to improve the detection of csPCa based on routinely performed clinical examinations through an automated machine learning platform (AutoML).

Methods: This study included a multicenter retrospective cohort and two prospective cohorts with 4747 cases from 9 hospitals across China. The multimodal data, including demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory tests, and ultrasound reports, of consecutive participants were retrieved using extract-transform-load tools. AutoML was applied to explore potential data processing patterns and the most suitable algorithm to build the Prostate Cancer Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System (PCAIDS). The diagnostic performance was determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for discriminating csPCa from insignificant prostate cancer (PCa) and benign disease. The clinical utility was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA) and waterfall plots.

Results: The random forest algorithm was applied in the feature selection, and the AutoML algorithm was applied for model establishment. The area under the curve (AUC) value in identifying csPCa was 0.853 in the training cohort, 0.820 in the validation cohort, 0.807 in the Changhai prospective cohort, and 0.850 in the Zhongda prospective cohort. DCA showed that the PCAIDS was superior to PSA or fPSA/tPSA for diagnosing csPCa with a higher net benefit for all threshold probabilities in all cohorts. Setting a fixed sensitivity of 95%, a total of 32.2%, 17.6%, and 26.3% of unnecessary biopsies could be avoided with less than 5% of csPCa missed in the validation cohort, Changhai and Zhongda prospective cohorts, respectively.

Conclusions: The PCAIDS was an effective tool to inform decision-making regarding the need for prostate biopsy and prebiopsy examinations such as mpMRI. Further prospective and international studies are warranted to validate the findings of this study.

Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100048428. Registered on 06 July 2021.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Prostate Biopsy Necessity Using PSA, MRI, and Hematologic Parameters.

Sungur M, Aykac A, Aydin M, Celik O, Kaya C J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797267 PMC: 11721894. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010183.


Automated machine learning models for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease assessed by controlled attenuation parameter from the NHANES 2017-2020.

Liu L, Lin J, Liu L, Gao J, Xu G, Yin M Digit Health. 2024; 10:20552076241272535.

PMID: 39119551 PMC: 11307367. DOI: 10.1177/20552076241272535.


Integrating Omics Data and AI for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis.

Ozaki Y, Broughton P, Abdollahi H, Valafar H, Blenda A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001510 PMC: 11240413. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132448.


Identifying Effective Biomarkers for Accurate Pancreatic Cancer Prognosis Using Statistical Machine Learning.

Abu-Khudir R, Hafsa N, Badr B Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835833 PMC: 10572229. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193091.

References
1.
Shao Y, Kim S, Moore D, Shih W, Lin Y, Stein M . Cancer-specific survival after metastasis following primary radical prostatectomy compared with radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients: results of a population-based, propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Urol. 2013; 65(4):693-700. PMC: 3825778. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.023. View

2.
Roobol M, Steyerberg E, Kranse R, Wolters T, van den Bergh R, Bangma C . A risk-based strategy improves prostate-specific antigen-driven detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2009; 57(1):79-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.08.025. View

3.
Zhu L, Mou W, Chen R . Can the ChatGPT and other large language models with internet-connected database solve the questions and concerns of patient with prostate cancer and help democratize medical knowledge?. J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):269. PMC: 10115367. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04123-5. View

4.
Suh J, Yoo S, Park J, Cho S, Cho M, Son H . Development and validation of an explainable artificial intelligence-based decision-supporting tool for prostate biopsy. BJU Int. 2020; 126(6):694-703. DOI: 10.1111/bju.15122. View

5.
Menze B, Kelm B, Masuch R, Himmelreich U, Bachert P, Petrich W . A comparison of random forest and its Gini importance with standard chemometric methods for the feature selection and classification of spectral data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009; 10:213. PMC: 2724423. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-213. View