» Articles » PMID: 37458916

Agreement Between Cardiac Output Estimation with a Wireless, Wearable Pulse Decomposition Analysis Device and Continuous Thermodilution in Post Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit Patients

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jul 17
PMID 37458916
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Pulse Decomposition Analysis (PDA) uses integration of the systolic area of a distally transmitted aortic pulse as well as arterial stiffness estimates to compute cardiac output. We sought to assess agreement of cardiac output (CO) estimation between continuous pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) guided thermodilution (CO-CCO) and a wireless, wearable noninvasive device, (Vitalstream, Caretaker Medical, Charlottesville, VA), that utilizes the Pulse Decomposition Analysis (CO-PDA) method in postoperative cardiac surgery patients in the intensive care unit.

Methods: CO-CCO measurements were compared with post processed CO-PDA measurements in prospectively enrolled adult cardiac surgical intensive care unit patients. Uncalibrated CO-PDA values were compared for accuracy with CO-CCO via a Bland-Altman analysis considering repeated measurements and a concordance analysis with a 10% exclusion zone.

Results: 259.7 h of monitoring data from 41 patients matching 15,583 data points were analyzed. Mean CO-CCO was 5.55 L/min, while mean values for the CO-PDA were 5.73 L/min (mean of differences +- SD 0.79 ± 1.11 L/min; limits of agreement - 1.43 to 3.01 L/min), with a percentage error of 37.5%. CO-CCO correlation with CO-PDA was moderate (0.54) and concordance was 0.83.

Conclusion: Compared with the CO-CCO Swan-Ganz, cardiac output measurements obtained using the CO-PDA were not interchangeable when using a 30% threshold. These preliminary results were within the 45% limits for minimally invasive devices, and pending further robust trials, the CO-PDA offers a noninvasive, wireless solution to complement and extend hemodynamic monitoring within and outside the ICU.

Citing Articles

Cardiac output wireless wearable devices are maybe not interchangeable with Swan-Ganz catheters yet, but the question is… have they reached mininvasive tools?.

Vetrugno L, Maggiore S, Deana C, Bellini V, Bignami E J Clin Monit Comput. 2024; 38(4):869-871.

PMID: 38700742 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-024-01167-w.

References
1.
Turan A, Chang C, Cohen B, Saasouh W, Essber H, Yang D . Incidence, Severity, and Detection of Blood Pressure Perturbations after Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Blinded Observational Study. Anesthesiology. 2019; 130(4):550-559. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002626. View

2.
Saugel B, Hoppe P, Nicklas J, Kouz K, Korner A, Hempel J . Continuous noninvasive pulse wave analysis using finger cuff technologies for arterial blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125(1):25-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.013. View

3.
Wagner J, Grond J, Fortin J, Negulescu I, Schofthaler M, Saugel B . Continuous noninvasive cardiac output determination using the CNAP system: evaluation of a cardiac output algorithm for the analysis of volume clamp method-derived pulse contour. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015; 30(4):487-93. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9744-1. View

4.
Kriz J, Seba P . Force plate monitoring of human hemodynamics. Nonlinear Biomed Phys. 2008; 2(1):1. PMC: 2315646. DOI: 10.1186/1753-4631-2-1. View

5.
Latham R, Westerhof N, Sipkema P, Rubal B, Reuderink P, Murgo J . Regional wave travel and reflections along the human aorta: a study with six simultaneous micromanometric pressures. Circulation. 1985; 72(6):1257-69. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.72.6.1257. View