The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI): a Scoping Review of Versions, Translations and Psychometric Properties

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2023 Jul 12

PMID 37434881

Authors

Mikkel M Thorrisen

Talieh Sadeghi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) is a brief instrument designed to assess the five-factor model (FFM) personality dimensions. It was specifically developed to provide a brief assessment option in situations where using more comprehensive FFM instruments would be unfeasible. The TIPI enjoys widespread use and has been translated into several different languages.

Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to generate an overview of different versions of the TIPI, and their psychometric properties in terms of two aspects of validity (convergent and structural) and two aspects of reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability).

Methods: Four databases (PsycINFO, PubPsych, Medline, and Web of Science) were searched for studies exploring psychometric properties of the TIPI (original and/or translated or revised versions), published in English as full-text original research articles. Additionally, manual searches were conducted on the official TIPI website and in reference lists. Studies who utilized the TIPI simply as a measure, without an aim of testing its psychometric properties, were excluded. A descriptive-analytical approach was utilized to generate overviews of available TIPI versions and their psychometric properties.

Results: In a total of 29 studies, 27 versions of the TIPI were identified, covering 18 different languages. Across versions, and evaluated against conventions of acceptable psychometric properties, the TIPI demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability, somewhat mixed results for convergent and structural validity, and inappropriate internal consistency.

Conclusion: Being a brief instrument, the TIPI is unsurprisingly characterized by certain psychometric shortcomings. However, the TIPI may represent a feasible compromise in instances where it is necessary to strike a balance between maximizing psychometric properties and minimizing survey length.

Citing Articles

Understanding Loneliness in Older Adults During the Pandemic: Predictors and Questionnaire Validation.

Orlandini R, Lusic Kalcina L, Anticevic V Diseases. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39997052 PMC: 11853930. DOI: 10.3390/diseases13020045.

Measurement of Dehumanization, Self-Dehumanization, and Empathy as Mediating Factors Among Healthcare Professionals.

Roupa A, Patelarou A, Giakoumidakis K, Fousiani K, Miliaraki M, Stratidaki E Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(1.

PMID: 39791682 PMC: 11720136. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13010075.

Current status and factors associated with sexual harassment among operating room nurses: a multi-center cross-sectional study.

Tang L, Yu X, Liu Y, Zhou J, Zhang D, Wang J BMC Nurs. 2024; 23(1):951.

PMID: 39722020 PMC: 11669247. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-024-02606-4.

Insulin Resistance, Temperament and Personality Traits Are Associated with Anhedonia in a Transdiagnostic Sample.

Siwek M, Chrobak A, Soltys Z, Dudek D, Krupa A Brain Sci. 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39335386 PMC: 11430038. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14090890.

Highest order moderation of extraversion and neuroticism into the relationship between job stress and flourishing: Mediated by readiness to change among Chinese medical teachers.

Yan S, Ping L, Feng X, Jin X Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33405.

PMID: 39040229 PMC: 11261031. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33405.

References

Cunningham W, Preacher K, Banaji M . Implicit attitude measures: consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychol Sci. 2001; 12(2):163-70. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00328. View

Mokkink L, Terwee C, Patrick D, Alonso J, Stratford P, Knol D . The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63(7):737-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006. View

Asunta P, Viholainen H, Ahonen T, Rintala P . Psychometric properties of observational tools for identifying motor difficulties - a systematic review. BMC Pediatr. 2019; 19(1):322. PMC: 6731620. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-019-1657-6. View

McCrae R, John O . An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers. 1992; 60(2):175-215. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x. View

Ozer D, Benet-Martinez V . Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005; 57:401-21. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127. View

Crede M, Harms P, Niehorster S, Gaye-Valentine A . An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012; 102(4):874-88. DOI: 10.1037/a0027403. View

Shi Z, Li S, Chen G . Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Medical College Students. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022; 15:1247-1258. PMC: 9121988. DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S357913. View

Paunonen S, Ashton M . Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001; 81(3):524-39. View

Eisinga R, Te Grotenhuis M, Pelzer B . The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. Int J Public Health. 2012; 58(4):637-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3. View

10.

Tricco A, Lillie E, Zarin W, OBrien K, Colquhoun H, Levac D . PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018; 169(7):467-473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850. View

11.

Rolstad S, Adler J, Ryden A . Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value Health. 2011; 14(8):1101-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003. View

12.

Nunes A, Limpo T, Lima C, Castro S . Short Scales for the Assessment of Personality Traits: Development and Validation of the Portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI). Front Psychol. 2018; 9:461. PMC: 5895732. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00461. View

13.

Judge T, Bono J . Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2001; 86(1):80-92. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80. View

14.

Roberts B, Kuncel N, Shiner R, Caspi A, Goldberg L . The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015; 2(4):313-45. PMC: 4499872. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x. View

15.

Pham M, Rajic A, Greig J, Sargeant J, Papadopoulos A, McEwen S . A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 5(4):371-85. PMC: 4491356. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123. View

16.

Abma I, Rovers M, van der Wees P . Appraising convergent validity of patient-reported outcome measures in systematic reviews: constructing hypotheses and interpreting outcomes. BMC Res Notes. 2016; 9:226. PMC: 4837507. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-2034-2. View

17.

Peters M, Marnie C, Tricco A, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L . Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020; 18(10):2119-2126. DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00167. View

18.

Thorrisen M, Sadeghi T, Wiers-Jenssen J . Internal Consistency and Structural Validity of the Norwegian Translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:723852. PMC: 8385139. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852. View

19.

Furnham A . Relationship among four Big Five measures of different length. Psychol Rep. 2008; 102(1):312-6. DOI: 10.2466/pr0.102.1.312-316. View

20.

Thorrisen M, Sadeghi T . The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI): a scoping review of versions, translations and psychometric properties. Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1202953. PMC: 10330951. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202953. View