» Articles » PMID: 26052958

A Scoping Review of Scoping Reviews: Advancing the Approach and Enhancing the Consistency

Overview
Date 2015 Jun 9
PMID 26052958
Citations 753
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The scoping review has become an increasingly popular approach for synthesizing research evidence. It is a relatively new approach for which a universal study definition or definitive procedure has not been established. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of scoping reviews in the literature.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A search was conducted in four bibliographic databases and the gray literature to identify scoping review studies. Review selection and characterization were performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms.

Results: The search identified 344 scoping reviews published from 1999 to October 2012. The reviews varied in terms of purpose, methodology, and detail of reporting. Nearly three-quarter of reviews (74.1%) addressed a health topic. Study completion times varied from 2 weeks to 20 months, and 51% utilized a published methodological framework. Quality assessment of included studies was infrequently performed (22.38%).

Conclusions: Scoping reviews are a relatively new but increasingly common approach for mapping broad topics. Because of variability in their conduct, there is a need for their methodological standardization to ensure the utility and strength of evidence.

Citing Articles

Exploring Acceptance of Digital Health Technologies for Managing Non-Communicable Diseases Among Older Adults: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Anisha S, Sen A, Ahmad B, Bain C J Med Syst. 2025; 49(1):35.

PMID: 40067482 PMC: 11897087. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-025-02166-3.


Social Determinants of Suicide and Suicidality in Serving Military Personnel: A Global Scoping Review.

Dawes N, Topp S, Fullagar B, Selman J, Pak A, Devine S Health Promot J Austr. 2025; 36(2):e70030.

PMID: 40059091 PMC: 11891116. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.70030.


The Landscape of Obesity Education Worldwide - Are We Doing Enough? Scoping Review of Content of Obesity Educational Interventions in Medical Schools and Residency Programs.

Elhag W, El Ansari W Obes Surg. 2025; .

PMID: 40032751 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07654-y.


Using virtual patients to enhance empathy in medical students: a scoping review protocol.

Yamada R, Futakawa K, Xu K, Kondo S Syst Rev. 2025; 14(1):52.

PMID: 40025554 PMC: 11871709. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-025-02793-4.


Enhancing Professionalism Online (Netiquette) in Medical Schools: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Ng D, Liang J, Wong R, Raveendran V, Phua G, Fong W J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025; 12:23821205241255268.

PMID: 40008119 PMC: 11851755. DOI: 10.1177/23821205241255268.


References
1.
Cahill J, Barkham M, Hardy G, Gilbody S, Richards D, Bower P . A review and critical appraisal of measures of therapist-patient interactions in mental health settings. Health Technol Assess. 2008; 12(24):iii, ix-47. DOI: 10.3310/hta12240. View

2.
Decaria J, Sharp C, Petrella R . Scoping review report: obesity in older adults. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012; 36(9):1141-50. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2012.29. View

3.
Kushki A, Chau T, Anagnostou E . Handwriting difficulties in children with autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review. J Autism Dev Disord. 2011; 41(12):1706-16. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-011-1206-0. View

4.
Levac D, Wishart L, Missiuna C, Wright V . The application of motor learning strategies within functionally based interventions for children with neuromotor conditions. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2009; 21(4):345-55. DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181beb09d. View

5.
Levac D, Colquhoun H, OBrien K . Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010; 5:69. PMC: 2954944. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69. View