» Articles » PMID: 37425870

Uncovering Protein Ensembles: Automated Multiconformer Model Building for X-ray Crystallography and Cryo-EM

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2023 Jul 10
PMID 37425870
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In their folded state, biomolecules exchange between multiple conformational states that are crucial for their function. Traditional structural biology methods, such as X-ray crystallography and cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), produce density maps that are ensemble averages, reflecting molecules in various conformations. Yet, most models derived from these maps explicitly represent only a single conformation, overlooking the complexity of biomolecular structures. To accurately reflect the diversity of biomolecular forms, there is a pressing need to shift towards modeling structural ensembles that mirror the experimental data. However, the challenge of distinguishing signal from noise complicates manual efforts to create these models. In response, we introduce the latest enhancements to qFit, an automated computational strategy designed to incorporate protein conformational heterogeneity into models built into density maps. These algorithmic improvements in qFit are substantiated by superior and geometry metrics across a wide range of proteins. Importantly, unlike more complex multicopy ensemble models, the multiconformer models produced by qFit can be manually modified in most major model building software (e.g. Coot) and fit can be further improved by refinement using standard pipelines (e.g. Phenix, Refmac, Buster). By reducing the barrier of creating multiconformer models, qFit can foster the development of new hypotheses about the relationship between macromolecular conformational dynamics and function.

References
1.
Otten R, Liu L, Kenner L, Clarkson M, Mavor D, Tawfik D . Rescue of conformational dynamics in enzyme catalysis by directed evolution. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):1314. PMC: 5883053. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03562-9. View

2.
Furnham N, Blundell T, DePristo M, Terwilliger T . Is one solution good enough?. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006; 13(3):184-5. DOI: 10.1038/nsmb0306-184. View

3.
Burley S, Berman H, Chiu W, Dai W, Flatt J, Hudson B . Electron microscopy holdings of the Protein Data Bank: the impact of the resolution revolution, new validation tools, and implications for the future. Biophys Rev. 2022; 14(6):1281-1301. PMC: 9715422. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-022-01013-w. View

4.
Afonine P, Grosse-Kunstleve R, Echols N, Headd J, Moriarty N, Mustyakimov M . Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2012; 68(Pt 4):352-67. PMC: 3322595. DOI: 10.1107/S0907444912001308. View

5.
Fromm S, OConnor K, Purdy M, Bhatt P, Loughran G, Atkins J . The translating bacterial ribosome at 1.55 Å resolution generated by cryo-EM imaging services. Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):1095. PMC: 9968351. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36742-3. View