» Articles » PMID: 37407165

Iodine Intake From Diet and Supplements and Urinary Iodine Concentration in a Cohort of Pregnant Women in the United States

Overview
Journal Am J Clin Nutr
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2023 Jul 5
PMID 37407165
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The DRI Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) in pregnancy for Iodine (I), an essential nutrient for fetal neurodevelopment, is 160 μg/d. Supplementation with 150 μg/d I/day is recommended during pregnancy, however, neither dietary intake or the combination of diet and supplement intake has been reported in US pregnant women.

Objective: Determine iodine intake from diet and supplements and iodine status in pregnancy by urinary iodine concentration in a large cohort of pregnant women.

Design: Pregnant women (n=750) completed the Diet History Questionnaire 2.0 from the National Institute of Cancer or multiple 24-hour recalls at baseline and identified their prenatal supplement(s). Dietary iodine intake was estimated using the USDA, FDA and ODS-NIH Database for the Iodine Content of Common Foods at enrollment, supplemental iodine intake throughout the study using content databases, and urinary iodine concentration (UIC) by the modified Sandell-Kolthoff reaction in samples collected between 14-20 weeks gestation (n=966).

Results: The median intake of iodine from diet was 108.8 μg/d, and 63% (473/750) were below the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR). Furthermore, 65% (529/818) took a supplement containing iodine, however, only 32% (259/818) took ≥150 μg/d. Median intake increased to 188.5 μg/d with the inclusion of I from supplements, however , 41% (380/925) remained below the EAR even after supplementation suggesting inadequate intake in nearly half of the cohort. A similar 48% (467/966) had UIC ≤150 μg/L.

Conclusions: Assessment of iodine status by UIC and intake of iodine from diet and supplements support a high prevalence of iodine insufficiency during pregnancy in this large cohort of US women.

Citing Articles

Prenatal iodine intake and infant temperament in a multiethnic US cohort.

Akinkugbe A, Duffy J, Kannan S, Hartman T, Landero J, Bosquet Enlow M Public Health Nutr. 2024; 27(1):e226.

PMID: 39501816 PMC: 11645109. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980024001575.

References
1.
Condo D, Huyhn D, Anderson A, Skeaff S, Ryan P, Makrides M . Iodine status of pregnant women in South Australia after mandatory iodine fortification of bread and the recommendation for iodine supplementation. Matern Child Nutr. 2016; 13(4). PMC: 6866154. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12410. View

2.
Arandia G, Sotres-Alvarez D, Siega-Riz A, Arredondo E, Carnethon M, Delamater A . Associations between acculturation, ethnic identity, and diet quality among U.S. Hispanic/Latino Youth: Findings from the HCHS/SOL Youth Study. Appetite. 2018; 129:25-36. PMC: 6390481. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.017. View

3.
Glinoer D . The regulation of thyroid function during normal pregnancy: importance of the iodine nutrition status. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004; 18(2):133-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2004.03.001. View

4.
Pino S, Fang S, Braverman L . Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine. Clin Chem. 1996; 42(2):239-43. View

5.
Andersen S, Karmisholt J, Pedersen K, Laurberg P . Reliability of studies of iodine intake and recommendations for number of samples in groups and in individuals. Br J Nutr. 2007; 99(4):813-8. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114507842292. View