» Articles » PMID: 37310560

Preclinical Evaluation of a Tool for Insertion Force Measurements in Cochlear Implant Surgery

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Jun 13
PMID 37310560
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Trauma that may be inflicted to the inner ear (cochlea) during the insertion of an electrode array (EA) in cochlear implant (CI) surgery can significantly decrease the hearing outcome of patients with residual hearing. Interaction forces between the EA and the cochlea are a promising indicator for the likelihood of intracochlear trauma. However, insertion forces have only been measured in laboratory setups. We recently developed a tool to measure the insertion force during CI surgery. Here, we present the first ex vivo evaluation of our tool with a focus on usability in the standard surgical workflow.

Methods: Two CI surgeons inserted commercially available EAs into three temporal bone specimens. The insertion force and the orientation of the tool were recorded together with camera footage. The surgeons answered a questionnaire after each insertion to evaluate the surgical workflow with respect to CI surgery.

Results: The EA insertion using our tool was rated successful in all 18 trials. The surgical workflow was evaluated to be equivalent to standard CI surgery. Minor handling challenges can be overcome through surgeon training. The peak insertion forces were 62.4 mN ± 26.7 mN on average. Peak forces significantly correlated to the final electrode insertion depth, supporting the assumption that the measured forces mainly correspond to intracochlear events and not extracochlear friction. Gravity-induced forces of up to 28.8 mN were removed from the signal, illustrating the importance of the compensation of such forces in manual surgery.

Conclusion: The results show that the tool is ready for intraoperative use. In vivo insertion force data will improve the interpretability of experimental results in laboratory settings. The implementation of live insertion force feedback to surgeons could further improve residual hearing preservation.

Citing Articles

First clinical implementation of insertion force measurement in cochlear implantation surgery.

Rau T, Bottcher-Rebmann G, Schell V, Cramer J, Artukarslan E, Baier C Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1400455.

PMID: 38711559 PMC: 11070539. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1400455.


Word Recognition with a Cochlear Implant in Relation to Prediction and Electrode Position.

Franke-Trieger A, Lailach S, Shetty J, Murrmann K, Zahnert T, Neudert M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(1).

PMID: 38202190 PMC: 10780042. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010183.

References
1.
Kobler J, Dhanasingh A, Kiran R, Jolly C, Ortmaier T . Cochlear Dummy Electrodes for Insertion Training and Research Purposes: Fabrication, Mechanical Characterization, and Experimental Validation. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:574209. PMC: 4506834. DOI: 10.1155/2015/574209. View

2.
De Seta D, Daoudi H, Torres R, Ferrary E, Sterkers O, Nguyen Y . Robotics, automation, active electrode arrays, and new devices for cochlear implantation: A contemporary review. Hear Res. 2022; 414:108425. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108425. View

3.
Todd C, Naghdy F, Svehla M . Force application during cochlear implant insertion: an analysis for improvement of surgeon technique. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007; 54(7):1247-55. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2007.891937. View

4.
Hogerle C, Englhard A, Simon F, Gruninger I, Mlynski R, Hempel J . Cochlear Implant Electrode Tip Fold-Over: Our Experience With Long and Flexible Electrode. Otol Neurotol. 2021; 43(1):64-71. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003362. View

5.
Zuniga M, Hugl S, Engst B, Lenarz T, Rau T . The Effect of Ultra-slow Velocities on Insertion Forces: A Study Using a Highly Flexible Straight Electrode Array. Otol Neurotol. 2021; 42(8):e1013-e1021. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003148. View