» Articles » PMID: 19447766

Soft Cochlear Implantation: Rationale for the Surgical Approach

Overview
Journal Trends Amplif
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2009 May 19
PMID 19447766
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent advances in cochlear implant technology have focused renewed attention on the preservation of residual hearing. The focus on preservation of residual hearing is driven by the concept of electroacoustic stimulation. This option depends on the insertion of a short cochlear implant electrode into the basal region of the cochlea while preserving native function in the apical region. The desire to preserve residual hearing has led to the development of the soft-surgery cochlear implantation technique. Here, the authors evaluate its various components. Avoiding entry of blood into the cochlea and the use of hyaluronate seem to be reasonably supported, whereas the use of topical steroids is unlikely to be beneficial. The site of entry into the cochlea, the use of contoured or straight devices, and the depth of insertion are also evaluated. The authors highlight the importance of systematic recording of outcomes and surgical events.

Citing Articles

Advances in Evaluation of Electrode Insertion Trauma Induced Residual Hearing loss in Cochlear Implant Recipients and its significance- A Narrative Review.

Das N, Sharma V, Goyal A Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024; 76(5):4949-4957.

PMID: 39376296 PMC: 11456118. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-024-04801-w.


A preoperative dose of the pyridoindole AC102 improves the recovery of residual hearing in a gerbil animal model of cochlear implantation.

Nieratschker M, Yildiz E, Gerlitz M, Bera S, Gadenstaetter A, Kramer A Cell Death Dis. 2024; 15(7):531.

PMID: 39060244 PMC: 11282255. DOI: 10.1038/s41419-024-06854-9.


Cochlear implant electrode design for safe and effective treatment.

Dhanasingh A, Nielsen S, Beal F, Schilp S, Hessler R, Jolly C Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1348439.

PMID: 38756216 PMC: 11096578. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1348439.


A novel method for evaluating mastoid defect regrowth after cochlear implantation.

Hamed N, Alahmadi A, Abdelsamad Y, Alballaa A, Almuhawas F, Allami H Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):9194.

PMID: 38649424 PMC: 11035648. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59295-x.


Acute histological reactions in the otolith organs to inner ear drug delivery through a cochlear implant.

Manrique-Huarte R, Alvarez De Linera-Alperi M, Perez-Fernandez N, Manrique M Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1363481.

PMID: 38469594 PMC: 10926955. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1363481.


References
1.
Huang C, Tykocinski M, Stathopoulos D, Cowan R . Effects of steroids and lubricants on electrical impedance and tissue response following cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2007; 8(3):123-47. DOI: 10.1179/cim.2007.8.3.123. View

2.
Paparella M, Lim D, Sugiura S . Inner ear pathology following stapedectomy in animals. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1967; 71(3):408-15. View

3.
Eshraghi A, Polak M, He J, Telischi F, Balkany T, van de Water T . Pattern of hearing loss in a rat model of cochlear implantation trauma. Otol Neurotol. 2005; 26(3):442-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000169791.53201.e1. View

4.
Kelly J, Khanna S . Distribution of cochlear damage caused by the removal of the round window membrane. Hear Res. 1984; 16(2):109-26. DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90001-7. View

5.
Eshraghi A, Adil E, He J, Graves R, Balkany T, van de Water T . Local dexamethasone therapy conserves hearing in an animal model of electrode insertion trauma-induced hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2007; 28(6):842-9. DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e31805778fc. View