» Articles » PMID: 37293411

Validity of the Xiaomi Mi Band 2, 3, 4 and 5 Wristbands for Assessing Physical Activity in 12-to-18-Year-Old Adolescents Under Unstructured Free-Living Conditions. Fit-Person Study

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Jun 9
PMID 37293411
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose was to assess the validity of four generations of Xiaomi Mi Band wristbands for the assessment of step count and physical activity (PA) levels among adolescents aged 12-18 years under free-living conditions. One hundred adolescents were invited to participate in the present study. The final sample consisted of 62 high-school students (34 females), aged 12-18 years old (M = 14.1 ± 1.6 years), who wore an ActiGraph accelerometer on their hip (PA and step count reference measures) and four activity wristbands (Xiaomi Mi Band 2, 3, 4, and 5) on their non-dominant wrist during the waking time of one day. Results showed that the agreement between daily PA levels (i.e., slow, brisk, and slow-brisk pace walking, total PA and moderate-to-vigorous PA) measured by Xiaomi Mi Band wristbands and the accelerometer were poor (ICC, 95% CI = 0.06-0.78, 0.00-0.92; MAPE = 50.1-150.6%). However, agreement between daily step count measured by the accelerometer and the Xiaomi Mi Band wristbands were between acceptable (MAPE = 12.2-13.6%) to excellent (ICC, 95% CI = 0.94-0.95, 0.90-0.97). Furthermore, the Xiaomi Mi Band wristbands have a good to excellent validity for correctly classifying adolescents as meeting or not meeting the recommended 10,000 steps per day ( = 0.89-0.95, = 0.71-0.87) and the recommended 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous PA per day ( = 0.89-0.94, = 0.69-0.83). Furthermore, comparability between the four Xiaomi Mi Band generations were poor to excellent (ICC, 95% CI = 0.22-0.99, 0.00-1.00) for the daily PA levels outputs, although it was excellent (ICC, 95% CI = 0.99-1.00, 0.96-1.00; MAPE = 0.0-0.1%) for daily step count. Different models of Xiaomi Mi Band wristbands were comparable and presented good validity for measuring adolescents' step count, and they accurately classified adolescents as meeting or not meeting the PA recommendations under free-living conditions.

Citing Articles

Developing a Health Support System to Promote Care for the Elderly.

Szanto M, Denes-Fazakas L, Noboa E, Kovacs L, Borsos D, Eigner G Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(2).

PMID: 39860825 PMC: 11769229. DOI: 10.3390/s25020455.


Association Between Temperature, Sunlight Hours, and Daily Steps in School-Aged Children over a 35-Week Period.

Rodriguez-Gutierrez E, Torres-Costoso A, Jimenez-Lopez E, Mesas A, Diaz-Goni V, Guzman-Pavon M J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768602 PMC: 11677288. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247679.


Daily steps, cardiorespiratory fitness, and remnant cholesterol in schoolchildren: mediation effects for cardiovascular prevention.

Rodriguez-Gutierrez E, Martinez-Vizcaino V, Bizzozero-Peroni B, Diaz-Goni V, Martinez-Garcia I, Sequi-Dominguez I Pediatr Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39695264 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03779-z.


Adherence Patterns and Health Outcomes in Spanish Young Women Participating in a Virtual-Guided HIIT Program: Insights from the Randomized Controlled WISE Trial.

Ferrando-Terradez I, San Martin Valenzuela C, Duenas L, Alcantara E, Sendin-Magdalena A, Ezzatvar Y Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(19).

PMID: 39408141 PMC: 11475678. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12191961.


Cross-validation of the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy second edition (CAPL-2) for Spanish children.

Mendoza Munoz M, Lopez-Gil J, Pastor-Cisneros R, Castillo Paredes A, Urbano Mairena J, Tremblay M BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2024; 10(3):e001971.

PMID: 39006391 PMC: 11243216. DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001971.


References
1.
Bland J, Altman D . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1(8476):307-10. View

2.
Hernaez R . Reliability and agreement studies: a guide for clinical investigators. Gut. 2015; 64(7):1018-27. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308619. View

3.
Van Hecke L, Loyen A, Verloigne M, van der Ploeg H, Lakerveld J, Brug J . Variation in population levels of physical activity in European children and adolescents according to cross-European studies: a systematic literature review within DEDIPAC. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016; 13:70. PMC: 5399406. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-016-0396-4. View

4.
Poitras V, Gray C, Borghese M, Carson V, Chaput J, Janssen I . Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016; 41(6 Suppl 3):S197-239. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0663. View

5.
Feehan L, Geldman J, Sayre E, Park C, Ezzat A, Yoo J . Accuracy of Fitbit Devices: Systematic Review and Narrative Syntheses of Quantitative Data. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018; 6(8):e10527. PMC: 6107736. DOI: 10.2196/10527. View