» Articles » PMID: 37278571

The Connectome-based Prediction of Trust Propensity in Older Adults: A Resting-state Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Jun 6
PMID 37278571
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A recent neuropsychoeconomic model of trust propensity argues that an individual uses economic (executive functions) and social (social cognition) rationality strategies to transform the risk of treachery (affect) into positive expectations of reciprocity, promoting trust in another person. Previous studies have shown that the trust of older adults is associated with affect and social cognition. However, little is known about the intrinsic functional connectivity correlated with trust propensity or whether trust propensity is associated with executive functions in older adults. In this study, we examined the association between trust propensity (measured by a one-shot trust game [TG]), social preference (measured by a one-shot dictator game), and executive functions (measured by a battery of neuropsychological tests). We also performed connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) and computational lesion analysis to identify the key large-scale resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) underlying the prediction of trust propensity. Our behavioral results showed a lower trust propensity in older adults in our study than in younger adults in a previous meta-analysis. Furthermore, trust propensity was associated with social preference, but there was no significant relationship between trust propensity and executive functions. The neuroimaging results showed that the cingulo-opercular network (CON) and the default mode network (DMN), rather than the frontoparietal network (FPN), significantly contributed to the prediction of trust propensity in older adults. Our findings suggest that older adults rely less on economic rationality (executive functions, associated with FPN) in trust games. Rather, they are likely to depend more on social rationality (social cognition, associated with social preference and DMN) to resolve the risk of treachery (affect, associated with CON) in trust dilemmas. This study contributes to a better understanding of the neural underpinnings of older adults' trust propensity.

Citing Articles

Transdiagnostic Connectome-Based Prediction of Response Inhibition.

Lv Q, Wang X, Kang N, Wang X, Lin P Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(3):e70158.

PMID: 39972946 PMC: 11839765. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70158.


Developing trustworthy artificial intelligence: insights from research on interpersonal, human-automation, and human-AI trust.

Li Y, Wu B, Huang Y, Luan S Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1382693.

PMID: 38694439 PMC: 11061529. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382693.


The connectome-based prediction of trust propensity in older adults: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Chen Y, He H, Lin W, Yang J, Tan S, Tao W Hum Brain Mapp. 2023; 44(11):4337-4351.

PMID: 37278571 PMC: 10318203. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26385.

References
1.
Bellucci G, Chernyak S, Goodyear K, Eickhoff S, Krueger F . Neural signatures of trust in reciprocity: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2016; 38(3):1233-1248. PMC: 5441232. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23451. View

2.
Yu J, Zhu L, Leslie A . Children's Sharing Behavior in Mini-Dictator Games: The Role of In-Group Favoritism and Theory of Mind. Child Dev. 2017; 87(6):1747-1757. DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12635. View

3.
Prakash R, Erickson K, Colcombe S, Kim J, Voss M, Kramer A . Age-related differences in the involvement of the prefrontal cortex in attentional control. Brain Cogn. 2009; 71(3):328-35. PMC: 2783271. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.07.005. View

4.
Ding J, Chen H, Qiu C, Liao W, Warwick J, Duan X . Disrupted functional connectivity in social anxiety disorder: a resting-state fMRI study. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 29(5):701-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2011.02.013. View

5.
Shao J, Zhang Q, Ren Y, Li X, Lin T . Why are older adults victims of fraud? Current knowledge and prospects regarding older adults' vulnerability to fraud. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2019; 31(3):225-243. DOI: 10.1080/08946566.2019.1625842. View