» Articles » PMID: 37210409

Metabolic Function-based Normalization Improves Transcriptome Data-driven Reduction of Genome-scale Metabolic Models

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 May 20
PMID 37210409
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are extensively used to simulate cell metabolism and predict cell phenotypes. GEMs can also be tailored to generate context-specific GEMs, using omics data integration approaches. To date, many integration approaches have been developed, however, each with specific pros and cons; and none of these algorithms systematically outperforms the others. The key to successful implementation of such integration algorithms lies in the optimal selection of parameters, and thresholding is a crucial component in this process. To improve the predictive accuracy of context-specific models, we introduce a new integration framework that improves the ranking of related genes and homogenizes the expression values of those gene sets using single-sample Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA). In this study, we coupled ssGSEA with GIMME and validated the advantages of the proposed framework to predict the ethanol formation of yeast grown in the glucose-limited chemostats, and to simulate metabolic behaviors of yeast growth in four different carbon sources. This framework enhances the predictive accuracy of GIMME which we demonstrate for predicting the yeast physiology in nutrient-limited cultures.

Citing Articles

State-of the-Art Constraint-Based Modeling of Microbial Metabolism: From Basics to Context-Specific Models with a Focus on Methanotrophs.

Kulyashov M, Kolmykov S, Khlebodarova T, Akberdin I Microorganisms. 2023; 11(12).

PMID: 38138131 PMC: 10745598. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11122987.


Applications of genome-scale metabolic models to investigate microbial metabolic adaptations in response to genetic or environmental perturbations.

Carter E, Constantinidou C, Alam M Brief Bioinform. 2023; 25(1).

PMID: 38048080 PMC: 10694557. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbad439.

References
1.
Talavera D, Kershaw C, Costello J, Castelli L, Rowe W, Sims P . Archetypal transcriptional blocks underpin yeast gene regulation in response to changes in growth conditions. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):7949. PMC: 5962585. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26170-5. View

2.
Agren R, Mardinoglu A, Asplund A, Kampf C, Uhlen M, Nielsen J . Identification of anticancer drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma through personalized genome-scale metabolic modeling. Mol Syst Biol. 2014; 10:721. PMC: 4017677. DOI: 10.1002/msb.145122. View

3.
Opdam S, Richelle A, Kellman B, Li S, Zielinski D, Lewis N . A Systematic Evaluation of Methods for Tailoring Genome-Scale Metabolic Models. Cell Syst. 2017; 4(3):318-329.e6. PMC: 5526624. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.01.010. View

4.
Frick O, Wittmann C . Characterization of the metabolic shift between oxidative and fermentative growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by comparative 13C flux analysis. Microb Cell Fact. 2005; 4:30. PMC: 1291395. DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-4-30. View

5.
Kim M, Lane A, Kelley J, Lun D . E-Flux2 and SPOT: Validated Methods for Inferring Intracellular Metabolic Flux Distributions from Transcriptomic Data. PLoS One. 2016; 11(6):e0157101. PMC: 4915706. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157101. View