» Articles » PMID: 37174986

Targeted Genomic Profiling and Chemotherapy Outcomes in Grade 3 Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (G3 GEP-NET)

Abstract

Background: Grade 3 gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (G3 GEP-NET) are poorly characterized in terms of molecular features and response to treatments.

Methods: Patients with G3 GEP-NET were included if they received capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) or oxaliplatin with either 5-fluorouracile (FOLFOX) or capecitabine (XELOX) as first-line treatment (chemotherapy cohort). G3 NET which successfully undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS) were included in the NGS cohort.

Results: In total, 49 patients were included in the chemotherapy cohort: 15 received CAPTEM and 34 received FOLFOX/XELOX. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 42.9%, 9.0 months, and 33.6 months, respectively. Calculating a Ki67 cutoff using ROC curve analysis, tumors with Ki67 ≥ 40% had lower ORR (51.2% vs. 0%; = 0.007) and shorter PFS (10.6 months vs. 4.4 months; < 0.001) and OS (49.4 months vs. 10.0 months; = 0.023). In patients who received FOLFOX/XELOX as a first-line treatment, ORR, PFS, and OS were 38.2%, 7.9 months, and 30.0 months, respectively. In the NGS cohort (N = 13), the most mutated genes were / (N = 5, 38%), (N = 4, 31%), (N = 4, 31%), (N = 2, 15%), and (N = 1, 8%).

Conclusions: FOLFOX/XELOX chemotherapy is active as the first-line treatment of patients with G3 GEP-NET. The mutational landscape of G3 NET is more similar to well-differentiated NETs than NECs.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic relevance of p53 and Rb status in neuroendocrine tumors G3 from different organs: an immunohistochemical study of 465 high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Kanaan C, Bani M, Ducreux M, Planchard D, Lamartina L, Moog S Virchows Arch. 2024; .

PMID: 39671088 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-024-04006-0.


Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Lamberti G, Panzuto F, Pavel M, OToole D, Ambrosini V, Falconi M Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024; 10(1):25.

PMID: 38605021 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-024-00508-y.

References
1.
Sorbye H, Welin S, Langer S, Vestermark L, Holt N, Osterlund P . Predictive and prognostic factors for treatment and survival in 305 patients with advanced gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (WHO G3): the NORDIC NEC study. Ann Oncol. 2012; 24(1):152-60. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds276. View

2.
Campana D, Walter T, Pusceddu S, Gelsomino F, Graillot E, Prinzi N . Correlation between MGMT promoter methylation and response to temozolomide-based therapy in neuroendocrine neoplasms: an observational retrospective multicenter study. Endocrine. 2017; 60(3):490-498. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-017-1474-3. View

3.
Ekeblad S, Sundin A, Janson E, Welin S, Granberg D, Kindmark H . Temozolomide as monotherapy is effective in treatment of advanced malignant neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2007; 13(10):2986-91. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2053. View

4.
Saranga-Perry V, Morse B, Centeno B, Kvols L, Strosberg J . Treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus with capecitabine and temozolomide: a case series. Neuroendocrinology. 2013; 97(4):318-21. DOI: 10.1159/000345938. View

5.
Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips S, Kundra R, Zhang H, Wang J . OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017; 2017. PMC: 5586540. DOI: 10.1200/PO.17.00011. View