» Articles » PMID: 37108764

A Decellularized Uterine Endometrial Scaffold Enhances Regeneration of the Endometrium in Rats

Overview
Journal Int J Mol Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Apr 28
PMID 37108764
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Partial or whole regeneration of the uterine endometrium using extracellular matrix (ECM)-based scaffolds is a therapeutic strategy for uterine infertility due to functional and/or structural endometrial defects. Here, we examined whether the entire endometrium can be regenerated circumferentially using an acellular ECM scaffold (decellularized endometrial scaffold, DES) prepared from rat endometrium. We placed a silicone tube alone to prevent adhesions or a DES loaded with a silicone tube into a recipient uterus in which the endometrium had been surgically removed circumferentially. Histological and immunofluorescent analyses of the uteri one month after tube placement revealed more abundant regenerated endometrial stroma in the uterine horns treated with tube-loaded DES compared to those treated with a tube alone. Luminal and glandular epithelia, however, were not fully recapitulated. These results suggest that DES can enhance the regeneration of endometrial stroma but additional intervention(s) are needed to induce epithelization. Furthermore, the prevention of adhesions alone allowed the endometrial stroma to regenerate circumferentially even without a DES, but to a lesser degree than that with a DES. The use of a DES together with the prevention of adhesions may be beneficial for efficient endometrial regeneration in the uterus that is largely deficient of endometrium.

Citing Articles

The application of tissue engineering strategies for uterine regeneration.

Chen S, Yoo J, Wang M Mater Today Bio. 2025; 31:101594.

PMID: 40070871 PMC: 11894340. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101594.


Comparative analysis of porcine-uterine decellularization for bioactive-molecule preservation and DNA removal.

Fazel Anvari Yazdi A, Tahermanesh K, Ejlali M, Babaei-Ghazvini A, Acharya B, Badea I Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1418034.

PMID: 39416283 PMC: 11480021. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1418034.


Evolution of biotechnological advances and regenerative therapies for endometrial disorders: a systematic review.

Rodriguez-Eguren A, Bueno-Fernandez C, Gomez-Alvarez M, Frances-Herrero E, Pellicer A, Bellver J Hum Reprod Update. 2024; 30(5):584-613.

PMID: 38796750 PMC: 11369227. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmae013.


Bioengineering approaches for the endometrial research and application.

Dai W, Liang J, Guo R, Zhao Z, Na Z, Xu D Mater Today Bio. 2024; 26:101045.

PMID: 38600921 PMC: 11004221. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101045.


Injectable "Homing-Like" Bioactive Short-Fibers for Endometrial Repair and Efficient Live Births.

Cao Y, Qi J, Wang J, Chen L, Wang Y, Long Y Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(20):e2306507.

PMID: 38504456 PMC: 11132084. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202306507.


References
1.
Tiemann T, Padma A, Sehic E, Backdahl H, Oltean M, Song M . Towards uterus tissue engineering: a comparative study of sheep uterus decellularisation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2020; 26(3):167-178. PMC: 7103571. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaaa009. View

2.
Keyhanvar N, Zarghami N, Bleisinger N, Hajipour H, Fattahi A, Nouri M . Cell-based endometrial regeneration: current status and future perspectives. Cell Tissue Res. 2021; 384(2):241-254. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-021-03419-6. View

3.
Xue B, Liu D, Song M, Zhao G, Cao Y, Yan G . Leukemia inhibitory factor promotes the regeneration of rat uterine horns with full-thickness injury. Wound Repair Regen. 2019; 27(5):477-487. DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12729. View

4.
Xin L, Lin X, Pan Y, Zheng X, Shi L, Zhang Y . A collagen scaffold loaded with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells facilitates endometrial regeneration and restores fertility. Acta Biomater. 2019; 92:160-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.012. View

5.
Miyazaki K, Maruyama T . Partial regeneration and reconstruction of the rat uterus through recellularization of a decellularized uterine matrix. Biomaterials. 2014; 35(31):8791-8800. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.052. View