» Articles » PMID: 33826100

Bioengineering of the Uterus

Overview
Journal Reprod Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2021 Apr 7
PMID 33826100
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Impairment of uterine structure and function causes infertility, pregnancy loss, and perinatal complications in humans. Some types of uterine impairments such as Asherman's syndrome, also known as uterine synechiae, can be treated medically and surgically in a standard clinical setting, but absolute defects of uterine function or structure cannot be cured by conventional approaches. To overcome such hurdles, partial or whole regeneration and reconstruction of the uterus have recently emerged as new therapeutic strategies. Transplantation of the whole uterus into patients with uterine agenesis results in the successful birth of children. However, it remains an experimental treatment with numerous difficulties such as the need for continuous and long-term use of immunosuppressive drugs until a live birth is achieved. Thus, the generation of the uterus by tissue engineering technologies has become an alternative but indispensable therapeutic strategy to treat patients without a functional or well-structured uterus. For the past 20 years, the bioengineering of the uterus has been studied intensively in animal models, providing the basis for clinical applications. A variety of templates and scaffolds made from natural biomaterials, synthetic materials, or decellularized matrices have been characterized to efficiently generate the uterus in a manner similar to the bioengineering of other organs and tissues. The goal of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview and perspectives of uterine bioengineering focusing on the type, preparation, and characteristics of the currently available scaffolds.

Citing Articles

Infertility treatment using polysaccharides-based hydrogels: new strategies in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Ghahremani-Nasab M, Babaie S, Bazdar S, Paiva-Santos A, Del Bakhshayesh M, Akbari-Gharalari N J Nanobiotechnology. 2025; 23(1):162.

PMID: 40033394 PMC: 11877900. DOI: 10.1186/s12951-025-03267-4.


Uterine Repair Mechanisms Are Potentiated by Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Decellularized Tissue Grafts Through Elevated , , and Gene Expression.

Bandstein S, De Miguel-Gomez L, Sehic E, Thoren E, Lopez-Martinez S, Cervello I Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39768086 PMC: 11673270. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11121268.


Advances in Nanomedicine and Biomaterials for Endometrial Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review.

Liu Y, Jia D, Li L, Wang M Int J Nanomedicine. 2024; 19:8285-8308.

PMID: 39161362 PMC: 11330863. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S473259.


Effect of collagen endometrial patch loaded with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on endometrial regeneration in rats with a thin endometrium.

Hong J, Ahn H, Moon S, Kang H, Yi K Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1287789.

PMID: 38089603 PMC: 10714005. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1287789.


ADSC-derived exosomes-coupled decellularized matrix for endometrial regeneration and fertility restoration.

Jin X, Dai Y, Xin L, Ye Z, Chen J, He Q Mater Today Bio. 2023; 23:100857.

PMID: 38075259 PMC: 10709080. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100857.


References
1.
Tiemann T, Padma A, Sehic E, Backdahl H, Oltean M, Song M . Towards uterus tissue engineering: a comparative study of sheep uterus decellularisation. Mol Hum Reprod. 2020; 26(3):167-178. PMC: 7103571. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaaa009. View

2.
Yang H, Wu S, Feng R, Huang J, Liu L, Liu F . Vitamin C plus hydrogel facilitates bone marrow stromal cell-mediated endometrium regeneration in rats. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017; 8(1):267. PMC: 5697119. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-017-0718-8. View

3.
Fayazi M, Salehnia M, Ziaei S . In-vitro construction of endometrial-like epithelium using CD146 mesenchymal cells derived from human endometrium. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017; 35(3):241-252. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.05.020. View

4.
Young R, Schumann R, Zhang P . Three-dimensional culture of human uterine smooth muscle myocytes on a resorbable scaffolding. Tissue Eng. 2003; 9(3):451-9. DOI: 10.1089/107632703322066633. View

5.
Hellstrom M, El-Akouri R, Sihlbom C, Olsson B, Lengqvist J, Backdahl H . Towards the development of a bioengineered uterus: comparison of different protocols for rat uterus decellularization. Acta Biomater. 2014; 10(12):5034-5042. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.018. View