» Articles » PMID: 37068251

Digitizing Chemical Discovery with a Bayesian Explorer for Interpreting Reactivity Data

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Apr 17
PMID 37068251
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interpreting the outcome of chemistry experiments consistently is slow and frequently introduces unwanted hidden bias. This difficulty limits the scale of collectable data and often leads to exclusion of negative results, which severely limits progress in the field. What is needed is a way to standardize the discovery process and accelerate the interpretation of high-dimensional data aided by the expert chemist's intuition. We demonstrate a digital Oracle that interprets chemical reactivity using probability. By carrying out >500 reactions covering a large space and retaining both the positive and negative results, the Oracle was able to rediscover eight historically important reactions including the aldol condensation, Buchwald-Hartwig amination, Heck, Mannich, Sonogashira, Suzuki, Wittig, and Wittig-Horner reactions. This paradigm for decoding reactivity validates and formalizes the expert chemist's experience and intuition, providing a quantitative criterion of discovery scalable to all available experimental data.

Citing Articles

Self-Driving Laboratories for Chemistry and Materials Science.

Tom G, Schmid S, Baird S, Cao Y, Darvish K, Hao H Chem Rev. 2024; 124(16):9633-9732.

PMID: 39137296 PMC: 11363023. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00055.


Digitizing chemical discovery with a Bayesian explorer for interpreting reactivity data.

M Mehr S, Caramelli D, Cronin L Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(17):e2220045120.

PMID: 37068251 PMC: 10151610. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2220045120.

References
1.
Segler M, Waller M . Neural-Symbolic Machine Learning for Retrosynthesis and Reaction Prediction. Chemistry. 2017; 23(25):5966-5971. DOI: 10.1002/chem.201605499. View

2.
Tundel R, Anderson K, Buchwald S . Expedited palladium-catalyzed amination of aryl nonaflates through the use of microwave-irradiation and soluble organic amine bases. J Org Chem. 2006; 71(1):430-3. DOI: 10.1021/jo052131u. View

3.
Zahrt A, Mo Y, Nandiwale K, Shprints R, Heid E, Jensen K . Machine-Learning-Guided Discovery of Electrochemical Reactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2022; 144(49):22599-22610. PMC: 9756344. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c08997. View

4.
Maryasin B, Marquetand P, Maulide N . Machine Learning for Organic Synthesis: Are Robots Replacing Chemists?. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018; 57(24):6978-6980. PMC: 6033144. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201803562. View

5.
Buitrago Santanilla A, Regalado E, Pereira T, Shevlin M, Bateman K, Campeau L . Organic chemistry. Nanomole-scale high-throughput chemistry for the synthesis of complex molecules. Science. 2015; 347(6217):49-53. DOI: 10.1126/science.1259203. View