» Articles » PMID: 37051681

Evofosfamide and Gemcitabine Act Synergistically in Pancreatic Cancer Xenografts by Dual Action on Tumor Vasculature and Inhibition of Homologous Recombination DNA Repair

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) form hypovascular and hypoxic tumors, which are difficult to treat with current chemotherapy regimens. Gemcitabine (GEM) is often used as a first-line treatment for PDACs but has issues with chemoresistance and penetration in the interior of the tumor. Evofosfamide, a hypoxia-activated prodrug, has been shown to be effective in combination with GEM, although the mechanism of each drug on the other has not been established. We used mouse xenografts from two cell lines (MIA Paca-2 and SU.86.86) with different tumor microenvironmental characteristics to probe the action of each drug on the other. GEM treatment enhanced survival times in mice with SU.86.86 leg xenografts (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.35,  = 0.03) but had no effect on MIA Paca-2 mice (HR = 0.91, 95% confidence interval = 0.37-2.25,  = 0.84). Conversely, evofosfamide did not improve survival times in SU.86.86 mice to a statistically significant degree (HR = 0.57,  = 0.22). Electron paramagnetic resonance imaging showed that oxygenation worsened in MIA Paca-2 tumors when treated with GEM, providing a direct mechanism for the activation of the hypoxia-activated prodrug evofosfamide by GEM. Sublethal amounts of either treatment enhanced the toxicity of other treatment in SU.86.86 but not in MIA Paca-2. By the biomarker γH2AX, combination treatment increased the number of double-stranded DNA lesions for SU.86.86 but not MIA Paca-2. The synergy between GEM and evofosfamide appears to stem from the dual action of GEMs effect on tumor vasculature and inhibition by GEM of the homologous recombination DNA repair process. 39, 432-444.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of a deuterated triarylmethyl spin probe for in vivo R ∗-based EPR oximetric imaging with enhanced dynamic range.

Kishimoto S, Devasahayam N, Chandramouli G, Murugesan R, Otowa Y, Yamashita K Magn Reson Med. 2023; 91(1):413-423.

PMID: 37676121 PMC: 10841161. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29811.

References
1.
Plunkett W, Huang P, Gandhi V . Preclinical characteristics of gemcitabine. Anticancer Drugs. 1995; 6 Suppl 6:7-13. DOI: 10.1097/00001813-199512006-00002. View

2.
Okusaka T, Ishii H, Funakoshi A, Ueno H, Furuse J, Sumii T . A phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2006; 36(9):557-63. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyl067. View

3.
Lohr M, Trautmann B, Gottler M, Peters S, Zauner I, Maillet B . Human ductal adenocarcinomas of the pancreas express extracellular matrix proteins. Br J Cancer. 1994; 69(1):144-51. PMC: 1968784. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1994.24. View

4.
Wei W, Wang J, Hu Y, Chen S, Liu J . Emodin reverses resistance to gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer by suppressing stemness through regulation of the epithelial‑mesenchymal transition. Exp Ther Med. 2022; 25(1):7. PMC: 9748633. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2022.11706. View

5.
Matsumoto S, Saito K, Yasui H, Morris H, Munasinghe J, Lizak M . EPR oxygen imaging and hyperpolarized 13C MRI of pyruvate metabolism as noninvasive biomarkers of tumor treatment response to a glycolysis inhibitor 3-bromopyruvate. Magn Reson Med. 2012; 69(5):1443-50. PMC: 3479339. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24355. View