Extending the Culture of Cleavage-stage Embryos to the Blastocyst Stage After Warming Increases the Chance of Live Birth: Does It Have a Regenerative Effect?

Overview

Journal Arch Gynecol Obstet

Specialty Gynecology & Obstetrics

Date 2023 Apr 6

PMID 37022346

Authors

Gogsen Onalan

Mehmet Tunc

Aytac Tohma

Emre Gunakan

Tahir Eryilmaz

Hulusi B Zeyneloglu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effect of extending the culture of cleavage-stage embryos to the blastocyst stage in vitrified-warmed cycles on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods: This is a retrospectively designed pilot study of a single center. All patients who applied for freeze-all cycle procedures during in vitro fertilization treatment were included in the study. Patients were classified into three subgroups. The embryos obtained were frozen at the cleavage or blastocyst stage. After a warming process, the cleavage-stage embryos were divided into two subgroups: the first group of embryos was transferred (vitrification day 3-embryo transfer (ET) day 3 (D3T3)) on the warming day; for the second group, the embryo culture was extended to the blastocyst stage (vitrification day 3-ET day 5 (after the extension of the embryo culture to the blastocyst stage), (D3T5)). Frozen blastocyst-stage embryos were transferred after warming (vitrification day 5-ET day 5 (D5T5)). Hormone replacement treatment was the only endometrial preparation regimen given during the embryo transfer cycle. The main outcome of the study was live birth rates. The clinical pregnancy rate and positive pregnancy test rate were determined as the secondary outcomes of the study.

Results: The study included a total of 194 patients. The positive pregnancy test rates (PPR) and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) of the D3T3, D3T5, and D5T5 groups were 14.0% and 59.2%; 43.8% and 9.3%; and 56.3% and 39.6%, respectively (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). The live birth rates (LBR) of patients in the D3T3, D3T5, and D5T5 groups were 7.0%, 44.7%, and 27.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis of patients with a poor number of 2PN embryos (defined as having < = 4 2PN embryos), the D3T5 group had significantly higher PPR (10.7%, 60.6%, 42.4%; p < 0.001), CPR (7.1%, 57.6%, 39.4%; p < 0.001), and LBR (3.6%, 39.4%, 21.2%; p: 0.001).

Conclusion: Extending the culture after warming to the blastocyst stage may be a better alternative than a cleavage-stage embryo transfer.

Citing Articles

Identifying key predictive features for live birth rate in advanced maternal age patients undergoing single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.

Liu L, Liu B, Liao M, Gan Q, Huang Q, Yang Y Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024; 22(1):120.

PMID: 39375693 PMC: 11457422. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-024-01295-7.

Live Birth after Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Mahmoudinia M, Sovizi B, Ebadi S, Zakerinasab F, Sadeghi T, Mahmoudinia M Int J Fertil Steril. 2024; 18(Suppl 1):10-16.

PMID: 39033365 PMC: 11263845. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.2000574.1463.

References

Gardner D, Schoolcraft W, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J . A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1999; 13(12):3434-40. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3434. View

Wong K, van Wely M, Mol F, Repping S, Mastenbroek S . Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 3:CD011184. PMC: 6464515. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub2. View

Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera A, Kaser D, Ubaldi F . Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 23(2):139-155. PMC: 5850862. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038. View

Van Landuyt L, Polyzos N, De Munck N, Blockeel C, van de Velde H, Verheyen G . A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(11):2509-18. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev218. View

Vladimirov I, Tacheva D, Diez A . Theory about the Embryo Cryo-Treatment. Reprod Med Biol. 2017; 16(2):118-125. PMC: 5661807. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12027. View

Gardner D, Schoolcraft W . Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 11(3):307-11. DOI: 10.1097/00001703-199906000-00013. View

Dobson S, Lao M, Michael E, Varghese A, Jayaprakasan K . Effect of transfer of a poor quality embryo along with a top quality embryo on the outcome during fresh and frozen in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(4):655-660. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.010. View

Li Y, Liu S, Lv Q . Single blastocyst stage versus single cleavage stage embryo transfer following fresh transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021; 267:11-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.004. View

Guerin P, El Mouatassim S, Menezo Y . Oxidative stress and protection against reactive oxygen species in the pre-implantation embryo and its surroundings. Hum Reprod Update. 2001; 7(2):175-89. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/7.2.175. View

10.

Tanaka A, Nagayoshi M, Takemoto Y, Tanaka I, Kusunoki H, Watanabe S . Fourteen babies born after round spermatid injection into human oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(47):14629-34. PMC: 4664346. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517466112. View

11.

Eftekhar M, Aflatoonian A, Mohammadian F, Tabibnejad N . Transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen-thawed cleavage stage embryos improved ongoing pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 286(2):511-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-012-2303-9. View

12.

Rahav-Koren R, Inbar S, Miller N, Wiser A, Yagur Y, Berkowitz C . Thawing day 3 embryos and culturing to day 5 may be a better method for frozen embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021; 38(11):2941-2946. PMC: 8608936. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02321-y. View

13.

De Croo I, Colman R, De Sutter P, Stoop D, Tilleman K . No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective study. Hum Reprod Open. 2022; 2022(3):hoac031. PMC: 9341301. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac031. View

14.

Xiong F, Li G, Sun Q, Wang S, Wan C, Chen P . Clinical outcomes after transfer of blastocysts derived from frozen-thawed cleavage embryos: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019; 300(3):751-761. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05236-3. View