» Articles » PMID: 34689021

Single Blastocyst Stage Versus Single Cleavage Stage Embryo Transfer Following Fresh Transfer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Date 2021 Oct 24
PMID 34689021
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare the available evidence of the effectiveness of single blastocyst stage transfer against the effectiveness of single cleavage stage embryo transfer.

Study Design: A systematic research based on Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed until May 2, 2020 to identify all relevant studies. The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager (RevMan) 5.0.2 software was used for statistical analysis.

Results: Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in analysis, involving 1784 patients in total, who were divided into 2 groups, which were the single blastocyst stage transfer (SBT) group of 932, and the single cleavage stage transfer (SCT) group of 852. Our meta-analysis concluded that SBT group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.26; 95%CI: 1.14-1.39), ongoing pregnancy rate (RR 1.19; 95%CI: 1.05-1.35) and delivery rate (RR 1.4; 95%CI: 1.13-1.75) than SCT group during the fresh transfer. While miscarriage rate (RR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.66-1.33), multiple pregnancy rate (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.51-2.45) and ectopic pregnancy rate (RR, 0.5; 95% CI: 0.13-1.90) between two groups showed no significant difference. However, the SCT group contained notably more cryopreserved embryos than the SBT group. (RR -0.68, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.41).

Conclusions: Our results indicate that single blastocyst stage transfer is associated with higher ongoing pregnancy rate and delivery rate comparing to single cleavage stage transfer in the clinical practice. Due to the low quality of the evidence of the primary outcomes, other higher-quality lager RCTs are necessary before a fully informed decision is made.

Citing Articles

Key glycometabolism during oocyte maturation and early embryonic development.

Zhang Y, Li T, Wang Y, Yu Y Reproduction. 2025; 169(3).

PMID: 39846956 PMC: 11840835. DOI: 10.1530/REP-24-0275.


Effect of sequential cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer compared to single cleavage stage embryo transfer on assisted reproductive technology outcome: An RCT.

Homayoon N, Arabian S, Mangoli E, Bayati F, Eftekhar M Int J Reprod Biomed. 2024; 22(6):433-440.

PMID: 39205923 PMC: 11347767. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v22i6.16793.


Follicular Fluid Metabolomics: Tool for Predicting IVF Outcomes of Different Infertility Causes.

Zhang Y, He C, He Y, Zhu Z Reprod Sci. 2024; .

PMID: 39090336 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01664-y.


Live Birth after Cleavage-Stage versus Blastocyst-Stage Embryo Transfer in Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Mahmoudinia M, Sovizi B, Ebadi S, Zakerinasab F, Sadeghi T, Mahmoudinia M Int J Fertil Steril. 2024; 18(Suppl 1):10-16.

PMID: 39033365 PMC: 11263845. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.2000574.1463.


Day 2 versus day 3 embryo transfer in patients with fertilization and only one zygote with two pronuclei.

Ye Y, Huang H, Wang L, Ding L, Mei L, Li P J Int Med Res. 2024; 52(3):3000605241233985.

PMID: 38548469 PMC: 10981240. DOI: 10.1177/03000605241233985.