» Articles » PMID: 36952569

A Systematic Evaluation of Deep Learning Methods for the Prediction of Drug Synergy in Cancer

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Mar 23
PMID 36952569
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the main obstacles to the successful treatment of cancer is the phenomenon of drug resistance. A common strategy to overcome resistance is the use of combination therapies. However, the space of possibilities is huge and efficient search strategies are required. Machine Learning (ML) can be a useful tool for the discovery of novel, clinically relevant anti-cancer drug combinations. In particular, deep learning (DL) has become a popular choice for modeling drug combination effects. Here, we set out to examine the impact of different methodological choices on the performance of multimodal DL-based drug synergy prediction methods, including the use of different input data types, preprocessing steps and model architectures. Focusing on the NCI ALMANAC dataset, we found that feature selection based on prior biological knowledge has a positive impact-limiting gene expression data to cancer or drug response-specific genes improved performance. Drug features appeared to be more predictive of drug response, with a 41% increase in coefficient of determination (R2) and 26% increase in Spearman correlation relative to a baseline model that used only cell line and drug identifiers. Molecular fingerprint-based drug representations performed slightly better than learned representations-ECFP4 fingerprints increased R2 by 5.3% and Spearman correlation by 2.8% w.r.t the best learned representations. In general, fully connected feature-encoding subnetworks outperformed other architectures. DL outperformed other ML methods by more than 35% (R2) and 14% (Spearman). Additionally, an ensemble combining the top DL and ML models improved performance by about 6.5% (R2) and 4% (Spearman). Using a state-of-the-art interpretability method, we showed that DL models can learn to associate drug and cell line features with drug response in a biologically meaningful way. The strategies explored in this study will help to improve the development of computational methods for the rational design of effective drug combinations for cancer therapy.

Citing Articles

Hallmarks of artificial intelligence contributions to precision oncology.

Chang T, Park S, Schaffer A, Jiang P, Ruppin E Nat Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 40055572 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-025-00917-2.


A guide for active learning in synergistic drug discovery.

Wang S, Allauzen A, Nghe P, Opuu V Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3484.

PMID: 39875437 PMC: 11775245. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85600-3.


Up to the Herculean Task of Tackling Cancer Therapy Resistance.

Papavassiliou K, Papavassiliou A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(10).

PMID: 38791904 PMC: 11119436. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101826.


Optimized models and deep learning methods for drug response prediction in cancer treatments: a review.

Hajim W, Zainudin S, Daud K, Alheeti K PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024; 10:e1903.

PMID: 38660174 PMC: 11042005. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1903.


Repurposing of the Cardiovascular Drug Statin for the Treatment of Cancers: Efficacy of Statin-Dipyridamole Combination Treatment in Melanoma Cell Lines.

Irie N, Mizoguchi K, Warita T, Nakano M, Sasaki K, Tashiro J Biomedicines. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38540310 PMC: 10968169. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12030698.


References
1.
Wakeling A, Guy S, Woodburn J, Ashton S, Curry B, Barker A . ZD1839 (Iressa): an orally active inhibitor of epidermal growth factor signaling with potential for cancer therapy. Cancer Res. 2002; 62(20):5749-54. View

2.
Sondka Z, Bamford S, Cole C, Ward S, Dunham I, Forbes S . The COSMIC Cancer Gene Census: describing genetic dysfunction across all human cancers. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018; 18(11):696-705. PMC: 6450507. DOI: 10.1038/s41568-018-0060-1. View

3.
Subramanian A, Narayan R, Corsello S, Peck D, Natoli T, Lu X . A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles. Cell. 2017; 171(6):1437-1452.e17. PMC: 5990023. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.049. View

4.
Baptista D, Ferreira P, Rocha M . Deep learning for drug response prediction in cancer. Brief Bioinform. 2020; 22(1):360-379. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbz171. View

5.
Wu Z, Ramsundar B, Feinberg E, Gomes J, Geniesse C, Pappu A . MoleculeNet: a benchmark for molecular machine learning. Chem Sci. 2018; 9(2):513-530. PMC: 5868307. DOI: 10.1039/c7sc02664a. View