User-generated Content and Influencer Marketing Involving E-cigarettes on Social Media: a Scoping Review and Content Analysis of YouTube and Instagram

Overview

Journal BMC Public Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2023 Mar 21

PMID 36941553

Authors

Marissa J Smith

Christina Buckton

Chris Patterson

Shona Hilton

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Evidence suggests that experimentation with e-cigarettes among young people is increasing. Social media is widely used by young people with user-generated content and influencer marketing particularly influential in promoting products. This paper documents a snapshot of online user-generated content and influencer marketing related to e-cigarettes on YouTube and Instagram.

Methods: Scoping review of relevant e-cigarette-related content on two social media platforms popular with youths, YouTube and Instagram, between June and August 2021. Content analysis was undertaken to examine text, audio, and video content, recording age restrictions, health warnings, page characteristics, and post characteristics. Narrative post content was coded using a coding frame that was developed inductively in response to emergent categories.

Results: Vaping was portrayed positively on social media; of the posts analysed, 86.5% (n = 90 of 104) of Instagram posts and 66.0% (n = 64 of 97) of YouTube videos. Warnings about age restrictions and health (e.g., nicotine addiction/toxicity) did not feature in the majority of posts; 43.3% (n = 42) of YouTube videos (n = 42) contained an age warning compared to 20.2% of Instagram posts (n = 21). While 25.8% (n = 25) of YouTube videos and 21.2% of Instagram (n = 22) posts contained a health warning.

Conclusion: Of concern is the fact that the vast majority of YouTube and Instagram content about e-cigarettes promoted their use, and typically the content does not contain age and/or health warnings. These findings may highlight a priority for governmental policy to restrict the ability of marketers to reach youths with social media content promoting e-cigarettes.

Citing Articles

Co-production of a youth advocacy video on the harms of e-cigarette advertising in Scotland.

Smith M, Vaczy C, Hilton S Health Promot Int. 2025; 40(2).

PMID: 40037914 PMC: 11879641. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae097.

The impact of the social media industry as a commercial determinant of health on the digital food environment for children and adolescents: a scoping review.

Lafontaine J, Hanson I, Wild C BMJ Glob Health. 2025; 10(2).

PMID: 39971584 PMC: 11840902. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014667.

Vaping-An Emerging Threat to Youngsters of Pakistan.

Jaffar N, Siddiqui H, Amin H, Haque M Addict Biol. 2025; 30(1):e70017.

PMID: 39838270 PMC: 11750584. DOI: 10.1111/adb.70017.

Concerns Over Vuse e-Cigarette Digital Marketing and Implications for Public Health Regulation: Content Analysis.

Han E, Lempert L, Vescia F, Halpern-Felsher B JMIR Form Res. 2025; 8:e54661.

PMID: 39760165 PMC: 11701674. DOI: 10.2196/54661.

Disposable e-cigarettes: Prevalence of use in Germany from 2016 to 2023 and associated user characteristics.

Klosterhalfen S, Viechtbauer W, Kotz D Addiction. 2024; 120(3):557-567.

PMID: 39488907 PMC: 11813731. DOI: 10.1111/add.16675.

References

Henry T, Kligerman S, Raptis C, Mann H, Sechrist J, Kanne J . Imaging Findings of Vaping-Associated Lung Injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019; 214(3):498-505. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.22251. View

Zare S, Nemati M, Zheng Y . A systematic review of consumer preference for e-cigarette attributes: Flavor, nicotine strength, and type. PLoS One. 2018; 13(3):e0194145. PMC: 5854347. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194145. View

OBrien E, Navarro M, Hoffman L . Mobile website characteristics of leading tobacco product brands: cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, e-cigarettes, hookah and cigars. Tob Control. 2018; . DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054549. View

Cole-Lewis H, Pugatch J, Sanders A, Varghese A, Posada S, Yun C . Social Listening: A Content Analysis of E-Cigarette Discussions on Twitter. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(10):e243. PMC: 4642379. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4969. View

Kucharska M, Wesolowski W, Czerczak S, Socko R . [Testing of the composition of e-cigarette liquids - Manufacturer-declared vs. true contents in a selected series of products]. Med Pr. 2016; 67(2):239-53. DOI: 10.13075/mp.5893.00365. View

Poerio G, Blakey E, Hostler T, Veltri T . More than a feeling: Autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR) is characterized by reliable changes in affect and physiology. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6):e0196645. PMC: 6010208. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196645. View

Zhu S, Sun J, Bonnevie E, Cummins S, Gamst A, Yin L . Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation. Tob Control. 2014; 23 Suppl 3:iii3-9. PMC: 4078673. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051670. View

Soneji S, Gerling M, Yang J, Sargent J . Online Electronic Cigarette Marketing-Violation of Self-regulated Standards by Tobacco Companies. JAMA Pediatr. 2016; 170(5):511-2. PMC: 5967242. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4501. View

Lee J, Henriksen L, Rose S, Moreland-Russell S, Ribisl K . A Systematic Review of Neighborhood Disparities in Point-of-Sale Tobacco Marketing. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105(9):e8-18. PMC: 4529779. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302777. View

10.

Phua J, Jin S, Hahm J . Celebrity-endorsed e-cigarette brand Instagram advertisements: Effects on young adults' attitudes towards e-cigarettes and smoking intentions. J Health Psychol. 2017; 23(4):550-560. DOI: 10.1177/1359105317693912. View

11.

Paek H, Kim S, Hove T, Huh J . Reduced harm or another gateway to smoking? source, message, and information characteristics of E-cigarette videos on YouTube. J Health Commun. 2013; 19(5):545-60. DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.821560. View

12.

Chu K, Colditz J, Primack B, Shensa A, Allem J, Miller E . JUUL: Spreading Online and Offline. J Adolesc Health. 2018; 63(5):582-586. PMC: 6201306. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.08.002. View

13.

Carpenter C, Wayne G, Pauly J, Koh H, Connolly G . New cigarette brands with flavors that appeal to youth: tobacco marketing strategies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24(6):1601-10. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1601. View

14.

Kong G, Krishnan-Sarin S . A call to end the epidemic of adolescent E-cigarette use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018; 174:215-221. PMC: 5776733. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.03.001. View

15.

Huang J, Duan Z, Kwok J, Binns S, Vera L, Kim Y . Vaping versus JUULing: how the extraordinary growth and marketing of JUUL transformed the US retail e-cigarette market. Tob Control. 2018; 28(2):146-151. PMC: 6274629. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054382. View

16.

Depue J, Southwell B, Betzner A, Walsh B . Encoded exposure to tobacco use in social media predicts subsequent smoking behavior. Am J Health Promot. 2014; 29(4):259-61. DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.130214-ARB-69. View

17.

Goniewicz M, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J . Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2013; 23(2):133-9. PMC: 4154473. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859. View

18.

Kong G, Kuguru K, Bhatti H, Sen I, Morean M . Marketing Content on E-Cigarette Brand-Sponsored Facebook Profile Pages. Subst Use Misuse. 2021; 56(4):442-448. PMC: 9057308. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1878223. View

19.

Amin S, Dunn A, Laranjo L . Social Influence in the Uptake and Use of Electronic Cigarettes: A Systematic Review. Am J Prev Med. 2019; 58(1):129-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.023. View

20.

Hebert E, Case K, Kelder S, Delk J, Perry C, Harrell M . Exposure and Engagement With Tobacco- and E-Cigarette-Related Social Media. J Adolesc Health. 2017; 61(3):371-377. PMC: 5572318. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.04.003. View