» Articles » PMID: 24935895

Four Hundred and Sixty Brands of E-cigarettes and Counting: Implications for Product Regulation

Overview
Journal Tob Control
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2014 Jun 18
PMID 24935895
Citations 473
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: E-cigarettes are largely unregulated and internet sales are substantial. This study examines how the online market for e-cigarettes has changed over time: in product design and in marketing messages appearing on websites.

Methods: Comprehensive internet searches of English-language websites from May-August 2012 and December 2013-January 2014 identified brands, models, flavours, nicotine strengths, ingredients and product claims. Brands were divided into older and newer groups (by the two searches) for comparison.

Results: By January 2014 there were 466 brands (each with its own website) and 7764 unique flavours. In the 17 months between the searches, there was a net increase of 10.5 brands and 242 new flavours per month. Older brands were more likely than newer brands to offer cigalikes (86.9% vs. 52.1%, p<0.01), and newer brands more likely to offer the more versatile eGos and mods (75.3% vs. 57.8%, p<0.01). Older brands were significantly more likely to claim that they were healthier and cheaper than cigarettes, were good substitutes where smoking was banned and were effective smoking cessation aids. Newer brands offered more flavours per brand (49 vs. 32, p<0.01) and were less likely to compare themselves with conventional cigarettes.

Conclusions: The number of e-cigarette brands is large and has been increasing. Older brands tend to highlight their advantages over conventional cigarettes while newer brands emphasise consumer choice in multiple flavours and product versatility. These results can serve as a benchmark for future research on the impact of upcoming regulations on product design and advertising messages of e-cigarettes.

Citing Articles

Co-production of a youth advocacy video on the harms of e-cigarette advertising in Scotland.

Smith M, Vaczy C, Hilton S Health Promot Int. 2025; 40(2).

PMID: 40037914 PMC: 11879641. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae097.


Association between type of smoking and smoking cessation plans in Korean adults: A nationwide cross-sectional study.

Park K, Kim D, Shin J, Nam C, Park E Tob Induc Dis. 2025; 23.

PMID: 40026694 PMC: 11869209. DOI: 10.18332/tid/199511.


The role of sweet/fruit-flavored disposable electronic cigarettes on early nicotine initiation - a systematic review.

Kopa-Stojak P, Pawliczak R BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):643.

PMID: 39962478 PMC: 11834490. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21897-z.


The effects of flavored vaped e-liquids on cultured human macrophages derived from the central and peripheral nervous systems.

Bradley C, Walker-Franklin I, Kovach A, Sivaraman V, Onyenwoke R Toxicol In Vitro. 2025; 104:106013.

PMID: 39894183 PMC: 11845287. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106013.


Unveiling the Digital Landscape of E-Cigarette Marketing in India: Evidence From Mixed Method Study.

Bahl D, Bassi S, Thapliyal N, Aneja K, Sinha P, Arora M Tob Use Insights. 2024; 17:1179173X241264504.

PMID: 39552925 PMC: 11568514. DOI: 10.1177/1179173X241264504.


References
1.
Mitka M . FDA exercises new authority to regulate tobacco products, but some limits remain. JAMA. 2009; 302(19):2078, 2080-1. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.1632. View

2.
Farsalinos K, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, Kyrzopoulos S, Voudris V . Characteristics, perceived side effects and benefits of electronic cigarette use: a worldwide survey of more than 19,000 consumers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(4):4356-73. PMC: 4025024. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110404356. View

3.
Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Papale G, Russo C, Polosa R . The emerging phenomenon of electronic cigarettes. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2012; 6(1):63-74. DOI: 10.1586/ers.11.92. View

4.
Zhu S, Gamst A, Lee M, Cummins S, Yin L, Zoref L . The use and perception of electronic cigarettes and snus among the U.S. population. PLoS One. 2013; 8(10):e79332. PMC: 3824062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079332. View

5.
Choi K, Fabian L, Mottey N, Corbett A, Forster J . Young adults' favorable perceptions of snus, dissolvable tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes: findings from a focus group study. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(11):2088-93. PMC: 3469759. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300525. View