Marketing Claims on the Websites of Leading E-cigarette Brands in England

Overview

Journal Tob Control

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2023 Jul 4

PMID 37402577

Authors

Matilda Kim Nottage

Eve Violet Taylor

Yebin Kim

Nicole Soh

David Hammond

Erikas Simonavicius

Ann McNeill

Deborah Arnott

Katherine East

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Exposure to electronic cigarette (EC) marketing is associated with EC use, particularly among youth. In England, the Tobacco and Related Products Regulations and Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) regulate EC marketing to reduce appeal to youth; however, there are little published data on EC marketing claims used online. This study therefore provides an overview of marketing claims present on the websites of EC brands popular in England.

Methods: From January to February 2022, a content analysis of 10 of England's most popular EC brand websites was conducted, including violation of CAP codes.

Results: Of the 10 websites, all presented ECs as an alternative to smoking, 8 as a smoking cessation aid and 6 as less harmful than smoking. Four websites presented ECs as risk-free. All mentioned product quality, modernity, convenience, sensory experiences and vendor promotions. Nine featured claims about flavours, colours, customisability and nicotine salts. Seven featured claims concerning social benefits, personal identity, sustainability, secondhand smoke and nicotine strength. Six featured claims about fire safety. Some claimed ECs are cheaper than tobacco (n=5), cited health professionals (n=4) or featured collaborations with brands/icons (n=4). All were assessed by the research team to violate one or more CAP code(s) by featuring medicinal claims (n=8), contents which may appeal to non-smokers (n=7), associations with youth culture (n=6), depictions of youth using ECs (n=6) or media targeting youth (n=5).

Conclusion: Among 10 top EC brand websites in England, marketing elements that might appeal to youth were commonly identified and CAP code compliance was low.

References

Cho Y, Thrasher J, Driezen P, Hitchman S, Reid J, Hammond D . Trends in exposure to and perceptions of e-cigarette marketing among youth in England, Canada and the United States between 2017 and 2019. Health Educ Res. 2021; 36(6):657-668. PMC: 8800160. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyab039. View

Goniewicz M, Knysak J, Gawron M, Kosmider L, Sobczak A, Kurek J . Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2013; 23(2):133-9. PMC: 4154473. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859. View

Knoll L, Leung J, Foulkes L, Blakemore S . Age-related differences in social influence on risk perception depend on the direction of influence. J Adolesc. 2017; 60:53-63. PMC: 5614112. DOI: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.07.002. View

East K, McNeill A, Thrasher J, Hitchman S . Social norms as a predictor of smoking uptake among youth: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of prospective cohort studies. Addiction. 2021; 116(11):2953-2967. DOI: 10.1111/add.15427. View

Mead E, Rimal R, Ferrence R, Cohen J . Understanding the sources of normative influence on behavior: the example of tobacco. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 115:139-43. PMC: 4124724. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.030. View

Pokhrel P, Herzog T, Fagan P, Unger J, Stacy A . E-cigarette Advertising Exposure, Explicit and Implicit Harm Perceptions, and E-cigarette Use Susceptibility Among Nonsmoking Young Adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018; 21(1):127-131. PMC: 6610163. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty030. View

Glasser A, Vojjala M, Cantrell J, Levy D, Giovenco D, Abrams D . Patterns of E-cigarette Use and Subsequent Cigarette Smoking Cessation Over 2 Years (2013/2014-2015/2016) in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 23(4):669-677. PMC: 7976933. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa182. View

Voelker D, Reel J, Greenleaf C . Weight status and body image perceptions in adolescents: current perspectives. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2015; 6:149-58. PMC: 4554432. DOI: 10.2147/AHMT.S68344. View

Chen-Sankey J, Unger J, Bansal-Travers M, Niederdeppe J, Bernat E, Choi K . E-cigarette Marketing Exposure and Subsequent Experimentation Among Youth and Young Adults. Pediatrics. 2019; 144(5). PMC: 6836725. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-1119. View

10.

Gravely S, Meng G, Hammond D, Hyland A, Cummings K, Borland R . Differences in cigarette smoking quit attempts and cessation between adults who did and did not take up nicotine vaping: Findings from the ITC four country smoking and vaping surveys. Addict Behav. 2022; 132:107339. PMC: 9202449. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107339. View

11.

Mantey D, Omega-Njemnobi O, Kelder S . E-Cigarette Use Is Associated With Intentions to Lose Weight Among High School Students. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018; 22(5):838-842. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty245. View

12.

Tattan-Birch H, Jackson S, Kock L, Dockrell M, Brown J . Rapid growth in disposable e-cigarette vaping among young adults in Great Britain from 2021 to 2022: a repeat cross-sectional survey. Addiction. 2022; 118(2):382-386. PMC: 10086805. DOI: 10.1111/add.16044. View

13.

Williams R, Derrick J, Liebman A, LaFleur K . Content analysis of e-cigarette products, promotions, prices and claims on Internet tobacco vendor websites, 2013-2014. Tob Control. 2017; 27(e1):e34-e40. PMC: 6054559. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053762. View

14.

Hammond D, Reid J, Burkhalter R, Rynard V . E-cigarette Marketing Regulations and Youth Vaping: Cross-Sectional Surveys, 2017-2019. Pediatrics. 2020; 146(1). PMC: 7329261. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-4020. View

15.

Hardie L, McCool J, Freeman B . Online retail promotion of e-cigarettes in New Zealand: A content analysis of e-cigarette retailers in a regulatory void. Health Promot J Austr. 2021; 33(1):91-98. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.464. View

16.

Yao T, Jiang N, Grana R, Ling P, Glantz S . A content analysis of electronic cigarette manufacturer websites in China. Tob Control. 2014; 25(2):188-94. PMC: 4405407. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051840. View

17.

Stead M, Ford A, Angus K, MacKintosh A, Purves R, Mitchell D . E-Cigarette Advertising in the UK: A Content Analysis of Traditional and Social Media Advertising to Observe Compliance with Current Regulations. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021; 23(11):1839-1847. PMC: 8496471. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab075. View

18.

Moodie C, Angus K, Stead M . Consumer Response to Standardized Tobacco Packaging in the United Kingdom: A Synthesis of Evidence from Two Systematic Reviews. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021; 14:1465-1480. PMC: 8053612. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S272259. View

19.

Moran M, Heley K, Czaplicki L, Weiger C, Strong D, Pierce J . Tobacco Advertising Features That May Contribute to Product Appeal Among US Adolescents and Young Adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2020; 23(8):1373-1381. PMC: 8360628. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa275. View

20.

Riwu Bara R, McCausland K, Swanson M, Scott L, Jancey J . "They're sleek, stylish and sexy:" selling e-cigarettes online. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2023; 47(1):100013. DOI: 10.1016/j.anzjph.2022.100013. View