» Articles » PMID: 36907592

Deep Learning-Based Computed Tomography Image Standardization to Improve Generalizability of Deep Learning-Based Hepatic Segmentation

Overview
Journal Korean J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Mar 12
PMID 36907592
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate whether image standardization using deep learning-based computed tomography (CT) image conversion would improve the performance of deep learning-based automated hepatic segmentation across various reconstruction methods.

Materials And Methods: We collected contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT of the abdomen that was obtained using various reconstruction methods, including filtered back projection, iterative reconstruction, optimum contrast, and monoenergetic images with 40, 60, and 80 keV. A deep learning based image conversion algorithm was developed to standardize the CT images using 142 CT examinations (128 for training and 14 for tuning). A separate set of 43 CT examinations from 42 patients (mean age, 10.1 years) was used as the test data. A commercial software program (MEDIP PRO v2.0.0.0, MEDICALIP Co. Ltd.) based on 2D U-NET was used to create liver segmentation masks with liver volume. The original 80 keV images were used as the ground truth. We used the paired -test to compare the segmentation performance in the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and difference ratio of the liver volume relative to the ground truth volume before and after image standardization. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was used to assess the agreement between the segmented liver volume and ground-truth volume.

Results: The original CT images showed variable and poor segmentation performances. The standardized images achieved significantly higher DSCs for liver segmentation than the original images (DSC [original, 5.40%-91.27%] vs. [standardized, 93.16%-96.74%], all < 0.001). The difference ratio of liver volume also decreased significantly after image conversion (original, 9.84%-91.37% vs. standardized, 1.99%-4.41%). In all protocols, CCCs improved after image conversion (original, -0.006-0.964 vs. standardized, 0.990-0.998).

Conclusion: Deep learning-based CT image standardization can improve the performance of automated hepatic segmentation using CT images reconstructed using various methods. Deep learning-based CT image conversion may have the potential to improve the generalizability of the segmentation network.

Citing Articles

Enhancing Radiomics Reproducibility: Deep Learning-Based Harmonization of Abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) Images.

Lee S, Hong Y, Cho Y, Jeong D, Lee J, Choi J Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39768030 PMC: 11673047. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11121212.


Style harmonization of panoramic radiography using deep learning.

Kim H, Seol J, Lee J, Han S, Yoo J, Lee C Oral Radiol. 2024; 41(1):111-119.

PMID: 39470914 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-024-00782-2.


Conceptual review of outcome metrics and measures used in clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence in radiology.

Park S, Han K, Lee J Radiol Med. 2024; 129(11):1644-1655.

PMID: 39225919 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01886-9.


Reporting Quality of Research Studies on AI Applications in Medical Images According to the CLAIM Guidelines in a Radiology Journal With a Strong Prominence in Asia.

Kim D, Oh H, Suh C Korean J Radiol. 2023; 24(12):1179-1189.

PMID: 38016678 PMC: 10701000. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2023.1027.

References
1.
Onofrey J, Casetti-Dinescu D, Lauritzen A, Sarkar S, Venkataraman R, Fan R . GENERALIZABLE MULTI-SITE TRAINING AND TESTING OF DEEP NEURAL NETWORKS USING IMAGE NORMALIZATION. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2020; 2019:348-351. PMC: 7457546. DOI: 10.1109/isbi.2019.8759295. View

2.
Willemink M, Koszek W, Hardell C, Wu J, Fleischmann D, Harvey H . Preparing Medical Imaging Data for Machine Learning. Radiology. 2020; 295(1):4-15. PMC: 7104701. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020192224. View

3.
Eche T, Schwartz L, Mokrane F, Dercle L . Toward Generalizability in the Deployment of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology: Role of Computation Stress Testing to Overcome Underspecification. Radiol Artif Intell. 2021; 3(6):e210097. PMC: 8637230. DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021210097. View

4.
Bluemke D, Moy L, Bredella M, Ertl-Wagner B, Fowler K, Goh V . Assessing Radiology Research on Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Guide for Authors, Reviewers, and Readers-From the Editorial Board. Radiology. 2020; 294(3):487-489. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019192515. View

5.
Joo B, Ahn S, Yoon P, Bae S, Sohn B, Lee Y . A deep learning algorithm may automate intracranial aneurysm detection on MR angiography with high diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol. 2020; 30(11):5785-5793. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06966-8. View