» Articles » PMID: 33052737

Data Augmentation and Transfer Learning to Improve Generalizability of an Automated Prostate Segmentation Model

Abstract

Deep learning applications in radiology often suffer from overfitting, limiting generalization to external centers. The objective of this study was to develop a high-quality prostate segmentation model capable of maintaining a high degree of performance across multiple independent datasets using transfer learning and data augmentation. A retrospective cohort of 648 patients who underwent prostate MRI between February 2015 and November 2018 at a single center was used for training and validation. A deep learning approach combining 2D and 3D architecture was used for training, which incorporated transfer learning. A data augmentation strategy was used that was specific to the deformations, intensity, and alterations in image quality seen on radiology images. Five independent datasets, four of which were from outside centers, were used for testing, which was conducted with and without fine-tuning of the original model. The Dice similarity coefficient was used to evaluate model performance. When prostate segmentation models utilizing transfer learning were applied to the internal validation cohort, the mean Dice similarity coefficient was 93.1 for whole prostate and 89.0 for transition zone segmentations. When the models were applied to multiple test set cohorts, the improvement in performance achieved using data augmentation alone was 2.2% for the whole prostate models and 3.0% for the transition zone segmentation models. However, the best test-set results were obtained with models fine-tuned on test center data with mean Dice similarity coefficients of 91.5 for whole prostate segmentation and 89.7 for transition zone segmentation. Transfer learning allowed for the development of a high-performing prostate segmentation model, and data augmentation and fine-tuning approaches improved performance of a prostate segmentation model when applied to datasets from external centers.

Citing Articles

Data augmentation via warping transforms for modeling natural variability in the corneal endothelium enhances semi-supervised segmentation.

Sanchez S, Vallez N, Bueno G, Marrugo A PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0311849.

PMID: 39531418 PMC: 11556704. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311849.


AI-ADC: Channel and Spatial Attention-Based Contrastive Learning to Generate ADC Maps from T2W MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection.

Ozyoruk K, Harmon S, Lay N, Yilmaz E, Bagci U, Citrin D J Pers Med. 2024; 14(10).

PMID: 39452554 PMC: 11508265. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14101047.


Deep learning for prediction of post-thrombectomy outcomes based on admission CT angiography in large vessel occlusion stroke.

Sommer J, Dierksen F, Zeevi T, Tran A, Avery E, Mak A Front Artif Intell. 2024; 7():1369702.

PMID: 39149161 PMC: 11324606. DOI: 10.3389/frai.2024.1369702.


Transition-zone PSA-density calculated from MRI deep learning prostate zonal segmentation model for prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Kuanar S, Cai J, Nakai H, Nagayama H, Takahashi H, LeGout J Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(10):3722-3734.

PMID: 38896250 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04301-z.


Emerging and anticipated innovations in prostate cancer MRI and their impact on patient care.

Correia E, Baydoun A, Li Q, Costa D, Bittencourt L Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(10):3696-3710.

PMID: 38877356 PMC: 11390809. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04423-4.


References
1.
Nyholm T, Jonsson J, Soderstrom K, Bergstrom P, Carlberg A, Frykholm G . Variability in prostate and seminal vesicle delineations defined on magnetic resonance images, a multi-observer, -center and -sequence study. Radiat Oncol. 2013; 8:126. PMC: 3680182. DOI: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-126. View

2.
Taha A, Hanbury A . Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med Imaging. 2015; 15:29. PMC: 4533825. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x. View

3.
Mehralivand S, Shih J, Harmon S, Smith C, Bloom J, Czarniecki M . A Grading System for the Assessment of Risk of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer at Multiparametric MRI. Radiology. 2019; 290(3):709-719. PMC: 6394788. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181278. View

4.
Litjens G, Toth R, Van de Ven W, Hoeks C, Kerkstra S, van Ginneken B . Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: the PROMISE12 challenge. Med Image Anal. 2014; 18(2):359-73. PMC: 4137968. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2013.12.002. View

5.
Gardner S, Wen N, Kim J, Liu C, Pradhan D, Aref I . Contouring variability of human- and deformable-generated contours in radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2015; 60(11):4429-47. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/11/4429. View