» Articles » PMID: 36893170

Mechano-biological and Bio-mechanical Pathways in Cutaneous Wound Healing

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Mar 9
PMID 36893170
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Injuries to the skin heal through coordinated action of fibroblast-mediated extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition, ECM remodeling, and wound contraction. Defects involving the dermis result in fibrotic scars featuring increased stiffness and altered collagen content and organization. Although computational models are crucial to unravel the underlying biochemical and biophysical mechanisms, simulations of the evolving wound biomechanics are seldom benchmarked against measurements. Here, we leverage recent quantifications of local tissue stiffness in murine wounds to refine a previously-proposed systems-mechanobiological finite-element model. Fibroblasts are considered as the main cell type involved in ECM remodeling and wound contraction. Tissue rebuilding is coordinated by the release and diffusion of a cytokine wave, e.g. TGF-β, itself developed in response to an earlier inflammatory signal triggered by platelet aggregation. We calibrate a model of the evolving wound biomechanics through a custom-developed hierarchical Bayesian inverse analysis procedure. Further calibration is based on published biochemical and morphological murine wound healing data over a 21-day healing period. The calibrated model recapitulates the temporal evolution of: inflammatory signal, fibroblast infiltration, collagen buildup, and wound contraction. Moreover, it enables in silico hypothesis testing, which we explore by: (i) quantifying the alteration of wound contraction profiles corresponding to the measured variability in local wound stiffness; (ii) proposing alternative constitutive links connecting the dynamics of the biochemical fields to the evolving mechanical properties; (iii) discussing the plausibility of a stretch- vs. stiffness-mediated mechanobiological coupling. Ultimately, our model challenges the current understanding of wound biomechanics and mechanobiology, beside offering a versatile tool to explore and eventually control scar fibrosis after injury.

Citing Articles

Effect of Carboxymethyl chitosan-sodium alginate hydrogel loaded with - on wound healing in rats.

Li J, Li L, Yu Y, Qin R, Yu C, Chen C Front Pharmacol. 2025; 16:1526828.

PMID: 39944622 PMC: 11813797. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1526828.


Biomechanics of soft biological tissues and organs, mechanobiology, homeostasis and modelling.

Holzapfel G, Humphrey J, Ogden R J R Soc Interface. 2025; 22(222):20240361.

PMID: 39876788 PMC: 11775666. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0361.


Epidermal stem cell-derived exosomes improve wound healing by promoting the proliferation and migration of human skin fibroblasts.

Kang D, Wang X, Chen W, Mao L, Zhang W, Shi Y Burns Trauma. 2024; 12:tkae047.

PMID: 39687464 PMC: 11647520. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkae047.


Tissue expansion mitigates radiation-induced skin fibrosis in a porcine model.

Nunez-Alvarez L, Ledwon J, Applebaum S, Progri B, Han T, Laudo J Acta Biomater. 2024; 189:427-438.

PMID: 39326692 PMC: 11570334. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2024.09.035.


Advancements in diabetic foot ulcer research: Focus on mesenchymal stem cells and their exosomes.

Wu S, Zhou Z, Li Y, Jiang J Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e37031.

PMID: 39286219 PMC: 11403009. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37031.


References
1.
Corr D, Gallant-Behm C, Shrive N, Hart D . Biomechanical behavior of scar tissue and uninjured skin in a porcine model. Wound Repair Regen. 2009; 17(2):250-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00463.x. View

2.
Guest J, Ayoub N, McIlwraith T, Uchegbu I, Gerrish A, Weidlich D . Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(12):e009283. PMC: 4679939. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283. View

3.
Dauendorffer J, Bastuji-Garin S, Guero S, Brousse N, Fraitag S . Shrinkage of skin excision specimens: formalin fixation is not the culprit. Br J Dermatol. 2009; 160(4):810-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08994.x. View

4.
Hadjipanayi E, Mudera V, BROWN R . Close dependence of fibroblast proliferation on collagen scaffold matrix stiffness. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2008; 3(2):77-84. DOI: 10.1002/term.136. View

5.
Pappalardo F, Russo G, Musuamba Tshinanu F, Viceconti M . In silico clinical trials: concepts and early adoptions. Brief Bioinform. 2018; 20(5):1699-1708. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bby043. View