» Articles » PMID: 24681636

A Cell-regulatory Mechanism Involving Feedback Between Contraction and Tissue Formation Guides Wound Healing Progression

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2014 Apr 1
PMID 24681636
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Wound healing is a process driven by cells. The ability of cells to sense mechanical stimuli from the extracellular matrix that surrounds them is used to regulate the forces that cells exert on the tissue. Stresses exerted by cells play a central role in wound contraction and have been broadly modelled. Traditionally, these stresses are assumed to be dependent on variables such as the extracellular matrix and cell or collagen densities. However, we postulate that cells are able to regulate the healing process through a mechanosensing mechanism regulated by the contraction that they exert. We propose that cells adjust the contraction level to determine the tissue functions regulating all main activities, such as proliferation, differentiation and matrix production. Hence, a closed-regulatory feedback loop is proposed between contraction and tissue formation. The model consists of a system of partial differential equations that simulates the evolution of fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, collagen and a generic growth factor, as well as the deformation of the extracellular matrix. This model is able to predict the wound healing outcome without requiring the addition of phenomenological laws to describe the time-dependent contraction evolution. We have reproduced two in vivo experiments to evaluate the predictive capacity of the model, and we conclude that there is feedback between the level of cell contraction and the tissue regenerated in the wound.

Citing Articles

Computational mechanobiology model evaluating healing of postoperative cavities following breast-conserving surgery.

Harbin Z, Sohutskay D, Vanderlaan E, Fontaine M, Mendenhall C, Fisher C Comput Biol Med. 2023; 165:107342.

PMID: 37647782 PMC: 10581740. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107342.


Computational Mechanobiology Model Evaluating Healing of Postoperative Cavities Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Harbin Z, Sohutskay D, Vanderlaan E, Fontaine M, Mendenhall C, Fisher C bioRxiv. 2023; .

PMID: 37162899 PMC: 10168325. DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.26.538467.


Mechano-biological and bio-mechanical pathways in cutaneous wound healing.

Pensalfini M, Tepole A PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(3):e1010902.

PMID: 36893170 PMC: 10030043. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010902.


Sensitivity of a two-dimensional biomorphoelastic model for post-burn contraction.

Egberts G, Desmouliere A, Vermolen F, van Zuijlen P Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2022; 22(1):105-121.

PMID: 36229698 PMC: 9957927. DOI: 10.1007/s10237-022-01634-w.


Supracellular measurement of spatially varying mechanical heterogeneities in live monolayers.

Bermudez A, Gonzalez Z, Zhao B, Salter E, Liu X, Ma L Biophys J. 2022; 121(18):3358-3369.

PMID: 36028999 PMC: 9515370. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.08.024.


References
1.
Discher D, Janmey P, Wang Y . Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science. 2005; 310(5751):1139-43. DOI: 10.1126/science.1116995. View

2.
Grinnell F . Fibroblast biology in three-dimensional collagen matrices. Trends Cell Biol. 2003; 13(5):264-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0962-8924(03)00057-6. View

3.
Grinnell F . Fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and wound contraction. J Cell Biol. 1994; 124(4):401-4. PMC: 2119916. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.124.4.401. View

4.
Gurtner G, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker M . Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008; 453(7193):314-21. DOI: 10.1038/nature07039. View

5.
Sherratt J, Murray J . Mathematical analysis of a basic model for epidermal wound healing. J Math Biol. 1991; 29(5):389-404. DOI: 10.1007/BF00160468. View