» Articles » PMID: 36874908

Nucleic Acid Nanostructures for Applications: The Influence of Morphology on Biological Fate

Overview
Journal Appl Phys Rev
Date 2023 Mar 6
PMID 36874908
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development of programmable biomaterials for use in nanofabrication represents a major advance for the future of biomedicine and diagnostics. Recent advances in structural nanotechnology using nucleic acids have resulted in dramatic progress in our understanding of nucleic acid-based nanostructures (NANs) for use in biological applications. As the NANs become more architecturally and functionally diverse to accommodate introduction into living systems, there is a need to understand how critical design features can be controlled to impart desired performance . In this review, we survey the range of nucleic acid materials utilized as structural building blocks (DNA, RNA, and xenonucleic acids), the diversity of geometries for nanofabrication, and the strategies to functionalize these complexes. We include an assessment of the available and emerging characterization tools used to evaluate the physical, mechanical, physiochemical, and biological properties of NANs . Finally, the current understanding of the obstacles encountered along the journey is contextualized to demonstrate how morphological features of NANs influence their biological fates. We envision that this summary will aid researchers in the designing novel NAN morphologies, guide characterization efforts, and design of experiments and spark interdisciplinary collaborations to fuel advancements in programmable platforms for biological applications.

Citing Articles

In Vivo Interactions of Nucleic Acid Nanostructures With Cells.

Xiao Y, Liang Z, Shyngys M, Baekova A, Cheung S, Muljadi M Adv Mater. 2024; 37(2):e2314232.

PMID: 39263835 PMC: 11733725. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202314232.


Emerging Biohybrids of Aptamer-Based Nano-Biosensing Technologies for Effective Early Cancer Detection.

Ram T, Krishnan S, Jeevanandam J, Danquah M, Thomas S Mol Diagn Ther. 2024; 28(4):425-453.

PMID: 38775897 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-024-00717-x.


pH-responsive i-motif-conjugated nanoparticles for MRI analysis.

Ma K, Perera-Gonzalez M, Langlois N, Alzubi O, Guimond J, Flask C Sens Diagn. 2024; 3(4):623-630.

PMID: 38646186 PMC: 11025034. DOI: 10.1039/d3sd00285c.


Dynamic RNA synthetic biology: new principles, practices and potential.

Li Y, Arce A, Lucci T, Rasmussen R, Lucks J RNA Biol. 2023; 20(1):817-829.

PMID: 38044595 PMC: 10730207. DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2023.2269508.

References
1.
Huang H, Belwal T, Li L, Xu Y, Zou L, Lin X . Amphiphilic and Biocompatible DNA Origami-Based Emulsion Formation and Nanopore Release for Anti-Melanogenesis Therapy. Small. 2021; 17(45):e2104831. DOI: 10.1002/smll.202104831. View

2.
Magnus M, Antczak M, Zok T, Wiedemann J, Lukasiak P, Cao Y . RNA-Puzzles toolkit: a computational resource of RNA 3D structure benchmark datasets, structure manipulation, and evaluation tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 48(2):576-588. PMC: 7145511. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1108. View

3.
Dietz H, Douglas S, Shih W . Folding DNA into twisted and curved nanoscale shapes. Science. 2009; 325(5941):725-30. PMC: 2737683. DOI: 10.1126/science.1174251. View

4.
Coleridge E, Dunn K . Assessing the cost-effectiveness of DNA origami nanostructures for targeted delivery of anti-cancer drugs to tumours. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022; 6(6). DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/abbe73. View

5.
Vindigni G, Raniolo S, Ottaviani A, Falconi M, Franch O, Knudsen B . Receptor-Mediated Entry of Pristine Octahedral DNA Nanocages in Mammalian Cells. ACS Nano. 2016; 10(6):5971-9. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.6b01402. View