» Articles » PMID: 36865624

Case Report: Experience with the Cube Navigation System in Complex Access Routes During CT-guided Lumbosacral Infiltration Therapy

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Mar 3
PMID 36865624
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Computed tomography (CT)-guided infiltrations are a mainstay in the treatment of lower back pain. Needle placement is usually performed using the free-hand method, where the translation from the planned needle angle to the actual needle insertion angle is estimated. However, the free-hand method is especially challenging in cases where a double-oblique access route (out-of-plane) rather than an in-plane route is necessary. In this case series, we report our experience with the patient-mounted Cube Navigation System to guide needle placement for complex access routes in lumbar pain therapy.

Research Design And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of five patients in whom a double-oblique access route was necessary for CT-guided lumbar infiltration pain treatment. Each of those procedures was done using the Cube Navigation System to provide navigational guidance. The mean patient age was 69 ± 13 years (range 58-82 years; all females). Technical success, procedure time, and number of control scans were determined retrospectively.

Results: Technical success (i.e., positioning and accuracy) was obtained in all cases. Mean procedure time was 15 ± 7 min (10-22 min); on average, 2 ± 1 CT control scans were performed. There were no complications or material failures reported in the present study.

Conclusion: Double-oblique punctures with the Cube Navigation System in this initial case series of complex access routes at the lumbar spine were accurate and the procedure was time efficient. In the authors' view, the Cube Navigation System has the potential to improve needle guidance for complex access routes, especially considering the ease of use of the device.

Citing Articles

Puncture Cube Patient-Mounted Navigation System versus Freehand Method for CT-Guided Needle Placement: Study on a Neoprene Covered Elliptical Cylinder Gelatin Phantom.

Wessendorf J, Scheschenja M, Bastian M, Gjini T, Viniol S, Owczarek A Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2024; 47(11):1527-1531.

PMID: 38987424 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03807-9.

References
1.
Schubert T, Jacob A, Pansini M, Liu D, Gutzeit A, Kos S . CT-guided interventions using a free-hand, optical tracking system: initial clinical experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 36(4):1055-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00270-012-0527-5. View

2.
Kettenbach J, Kronreif G . Robotic systems for percutaneous needle-guided interventions. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2014; 24(1):45-53. DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2014.977299. View

3.
Gruber-Rouh T, Schulz B, Eichler K, Naguib N, Vogl T, Zangos S . Radiation dose and quickness of needle CT-interventions using a laser navigation system (LNS) compared with conventional method. Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84(10):1976-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.004. View

4.
Manchikanti L, Knezevic N, Navani A, Christo P, Limerick G, Calodney A . Epidural Interventions in the Management of Chronic Spinal Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Comprehensive Evidence-Based Guidelines. Pain Physician. 2021; 24(S1):S27-S208. View

5.
Mokry A, Willmitzer F, Hostettler R, Richter H, Kircher P, Kneissl S . Evaluation of a novel, patient-mounted system for CT-guided needle navigation-an ex vivo study. Neuroradiology. 2018; 61(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-018-2107-0. View