» Articles » PMID: 36851914

Computational Prediction of Disordered Binding Regions

Overview
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Feb 28
PMID 36851914
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the key features of intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) is their ability to interact with a broad range of partner molecules. Multiple types of interacting IDRs were identified including molecular recognition fragments (MoRFs), short linear sequence motifs (SLiMs), and protein-, nucleic acids- and lipid-binding regions. Prediction of binding IDRs in protein sequences is gaining momentum in recent years. We survey 38 predictors of binding IDRs that target interactions with a diverse set of partners, such as peptides, proteins, RNA, DNA and lipids. We offer a historical perspective and highlight key events that fueled efforts to develop these methods. These tools rely on a diverse range of predictive architectures that include scoring functions, regular expressions, traditional and deep machine learning and meta-models. Recent efforts focus on the development of deep neural network-based architectures and extending coverage to RNA, DNA and lipid-binding IDRs. We analyze availability of these methods and show that providing implementations and webservers results in much higher rates of citations/use. We also make several recommendations to take advantage of modern deep network architectures, develop tools that bundle predictions of multiple and different types of binding IDRs, and work on algorithms that model structures of the resulting complexes.

Citing Articles

Twenty years of advances in prediction of nucleic acid-binding residues in protein sequences.

Basu S, Yu J, Kihara D, Kurgan L Brief Bioinform. 2025; 26(1).

PMID: 39833102 PMC: 11745544. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaf016.


Evaluation of predictions of disordered binding regions in the CAID2 experiment.

Zhang F, Kurgan L Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025; 27():78-88.

PMID: 39811792 PMC: 11732247. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.12.009.


Prediction of Disordered Linkers Using APOD.

Peng Z, Wu H, Luo Y, Kurgan L Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2867:219-231.

PMID: 39576584 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4196-5_13.


Accurate and Fast Prediction of Intrinsic Disorder Using flDPnn.

Wang K, Hu G, Wu Z, Kurgan L Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2867:201-218.

PMID: 39576583 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4196-5_12.


DescribePROT Database of Residue-Level Protein Structure and Function Annotations.

Zhao B, Basu S, Kurgan L Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2867:169-184.

PMID: 39576581 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4196-5_10.


References
1.
Meng F, Uversky V, Kurgan L . Comprehensive review of methods for prediction of intrinsic disorder and its molecular functions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017; 74(17):3069-3090. PMC: 11107660. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-017-2555-4. View

2.
Cheng X, Xiao X, Chou K . pLoc-mEuk: Predict subcellular localization of multi-label eukaryotic proteins by extracting the key GO information into general PseAAC. Genomics. 2017; 110(1):50-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2017.08.005. View

3.
Oates M, Romero P, Ishida T, Ghalwash M, Mizianty M, Xue B . D²P²: database of disordered protein predictions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 41(Database issue):D508-16. PMC: 3531159. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks1226. View

4.
Patil A, Kinoshita K, Nakamura H . Domain distribution and intrinsic disorder in hubs in the human protein-protein interaction network. Protein Sci. 2010; 19(8):1461-8. PMC: 2923499. DOI: 10.1002/pro.425. View

5.
Davey N, Cowan J, Shields D, Gibson T, Coldwell M, Edwards R . SLiMPrints: conservation-based discovery of functional motif fingerprints in intrinsically disordered protein regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(21):10628-41. PMC: 3510515. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gks854. View