» Articles » PMID: 36850354

Revealing the Mutual Information Between Body-Worn Sensors and Metabolic Cost in Running

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Feb 28
PMID 36850354
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Running power is a popular measure to gauge objective intensity. It has recently been shown, though, that foot-worn sensors alone cannot reflect variations in the exerted energy that stems from changes in the running economy. In order to support long-term improvement in running, these changes need to be taken into account. We propose leveraging the presence of two additional sensors worn by the most ambitious recreational runners for improved measurement: a watch and a heart rate chest strap. Using these accelerometers, which are already present and distributed over the athlete's body, carries more information about metabolic demand than a single foot-worn sensor. In this work, we demonstrate the mutual information between acceleration data and the metabolic demand of running by leveraging the information bottleneck of a constrained convolutional neural network. We perform lab measurements on 29 ambitious recreational runners (age = 28 ± 7 years, weekly running distance = 50 ± 25 km, V˙O2max = 60.3 ± 7.4 mL · min·kg). We show that information about the metabolic demand of running is contained in kinetic data. Additionally, we prove that the combination of three sensors (foot, torso, and lower arm) carries significantly more information than a single foot-worn sensor. We advocate for the development of running power systems that incorporate the sensors in watches and chest straps to improve the validity of running power and, thereby, long-term training planning.

References
1.
Ettema G, Loras H . Efficiency in cycling: a review. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009; 106(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1008-7. View

2.
Morgan D, MARTIN P, Craib M, Caruso C, Clifton R, Hopewell R . Effect of step length optimization on the aerobic demand of running. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994; 77(1):245-51. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.1.245. View

3.
Muniz-Pardos B, Sutehall S, Gellaerts J, Falbriard M, Mariani B, Bosch A . Integration of Wearable Sensors Into the Evaluation of Running Economy and Foot Mechanics in Elite Runners. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2018; 17(12):480-488. DOI: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000550. View

4.
Li S, Xue J, Hong P, Song C, He Z . Comparison of energy expenditure and substrate metabolism during overground and motorized treadmill running in Chinese middle-aged women. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):1815. PMC: 7000674. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58791-0. View

5.
Barnes K, Kilding A . Running economy: measurement, norms, and determining factors. Sports Med Open. 2016; 1(1):8. PMC: 4555089. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-015-0007-y. View