» Articles » PMID: 19229554

Efficiency in Cycling: a Review

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2009 Feb 21
PMID 19229554
Citations 64
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We focus on the effect of cadence and work rate on energy expenditure and efficiency in cycling, and present arguments to support the contention that gross efficiency can be considered to be the most relevant expression of efficiency. A linear relationship between work rate and energy expenditure appears to be a rather consistent outcome among the various studies considered in this review, irrespective of subject performance level. This relationship is an example of the Fenn effect, described more than 80 years ago for muscle contraction. About 91% of all variance in energy expenditure can be explained by work rate, with only about 10% being explained by cadence. Gross efficiency is strongly dependent on work rate, mainly because of the diminishing effect of the (zero work-rate) base-line energy expenditure with increasing work rate. The finding that elite athletes have a higher gross efficiency than lower-level performers may largely be explained by this phenomenon. However, no firm conclusions can be drawn about the energetically optimal cadence for cycling because of the multiple factors associated with cadence that affect energy expenditure.

Citing Articles

Sex Differences in Performance and Performance-Determining Factors in the Olympic Winter Endurance Sports.

Solli G, Sandbakk O, McGawley K Sports Med Open. 2024; 10(1):126.

PMID: 39565528 PMC: 11579258. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-024-00792-8.


Brief cycling intervals incrementally increase the number of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in human peripheral blood.

Pradana F, Nijjar T, Cox P, Morgan P, Podlogar T, Lucas S Front Physiol. 2024; 15:1327269.

PMID: 39139483 PMC: 11319260. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1327269.


Leg cycling efficiency is unaltered in healthy aging regardless of sex or training status.

Duong J, Leija R, Osmond A, Arevalo J, Brooks G J Appl Physiol (1985). 2024; 137(4):857-863.

PMID: 39088644 PMC: 11486473. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00393.2024.


Mechanical efficiency: associations with body composition and glycemic profile in healthy adults.

Marin-Couture E, Perusse L, Bouchard C, Schrauwen P, Joanisse D, Tremblay A Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024; 124(12):3661-3670.

PMID: 39068628 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-024-05528-w.


Running Economy in the Vertical Kilometer.

Bascuas P, Gutierrez H, Piedrafita E, Rabal-Pelay J, Berzosa C, Bataller-Cervero A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(23).

PMID: 38067721 PMC: 10708873. DOI: 10.3390/s23239349.


References
1.
Bijker K, de Groot G, Hollander A . Delta efficiencies of running and cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001; 33(9):1546-51. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200109000-00019. View

2.
Coast J, Cox R, Welch H . Optimal pedalling rate in prolonged bouts of cycle ergometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986; 18(2):225-30. View

3.
Kautz S, Hull M, Neptune R . A comparison of muscular mechanical energy expenditure and internal work in cycling. J Biomech. 1994; 27(12):1459-67. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90195-3. View

4.
McGregor M, BECKLAKE M . The relationship of oxygen cost of breathing to respiratory mechanical work and respiratory force. J Clin Invest. 1961; 40:971-80. PMC: 290814. DOI: 10.1172/JCI104336. View

5.
McDaniel J, Durstine J, Hand G, Martin J . Determinants of metabolic cost during submaximal cycling. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002; 93(3):823-8. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00982.2001. View