» Articles » PMID: 26816209

Is There an Economical Running Technique? A Review of Modifiable Biomechanical Factors Affecting Running Economy

Overview
Journal Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2016 Jan 28
PMID 26816209
Citations 94
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Running economy (RE) has a strong relationship with running performance, and modifiable running biomechanics are a determining factor of RE. The purposes of this review were to (1) examine the intrinsic and extrinsic modifiable biomechanical factors affecting RE; (2) assess training-induced changes in RE and running biomechanics; (3) evaluate whether an economical running technique can be recommended and; (4) discuss potential areas for future research. Based on current evidence, the intrinsic factors that appeared beneficial for RE were using a preferred stride length range, which allows for stride length deviations up to 3 % shorter than preferred stride length; lower vertical oscillation; greater leg stiffness; low lower limb moment of inertia; less leg extension at toe-off; larger stride angles; alignment of the ground reaction force and leg axis during propulsion; maintaining arm swing; low thigh antagonist-agonist muscular coactivation; and low activation of lower limb muscles during propulsion. Extrinsic factors associated with a better RE were a firm, compliant shoe-surface interaction and being barefoot or wearing lightweight shoes. Several other modifiable biomechanical factors presented inconsistent relationships with RE. Running biomechanics during ground contact appeared to play an important role, specifically those during propulsion. Therefore, this phase has the strongest direct links with RE. Recurring methodological problems exist within the literature, such as cross-comparisons, assessing variables in isolation, and acute to short-term interventions. Therefore, recommending a general economical running technique should be approached with caution. Future work should focus on interdisciplinary longitudinal investigations combining RE, kinematics, kinetics, and neuromuscular and anatomical aspects, as well as applying a synergistic approach to understanding the role of kinetics.

Citing Articles

Prediction of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces Under Different Running Speeds: Integration of Wearable IMU with CNN-xLSTM.

Chen T, Xu D, Zhou Z, Zhou H, Shao S, Gu Y Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(4).

PMID: 40006478 PMC: 11861149. DOI: 10.3390/s25041249.


Active Arm Swing During Running Improves Rotational Stability of the Upper Body and Metabolic Energy Efficiency.

Koo Y, Ogihara N, Koo S Ann Biomed Eng. 2025; .

PMID: 39900823 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-025-03688-0.


Influence of Running Surface Using Advanced Footwear Technology Spikes on Middle- and Long-Distance Running Performance Measures.

Alda-Blanco A, Rodriguez-Barbero S, Rodrigo-Carranza V, Valero F, Chico P, Gonzalez-Mohino F Sports (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39728869 PMC: 11679710. DOI: 10.3390/sports12120329.


Automatic Recognition of Motor Skills in Triathlon: A Novel Tool for Measuring Movement Cadence and Cycling Tasks.

Chesher S, Martinotti C, Chapman D, Rosalie S, Charlton P, Netto K J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 39728253 PMC: 11676696. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9040269.


Impact of elbow stiffness on running economy in trained athletes.

Wilk C, Besson C, Stockton L, Vauclair F, Gremeaux V Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241306369.

PMID: 39713259 PMC: 11656458. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241306369.


References
1.
Rassier D, MacIntosh B, Herzog W . Length dependence of active force production in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999; 86(5):1445-57. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1445. View

2.
Paavolainen L, Hakkinen K, Hamalainen I, Nummela A, Rusko H . Explosive-strength training improves 5-km running time by improving running economy and muscle power. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999; 86(5):1527-33. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1527. View

3.
Chang Y, Kram R . Metabolic cost of generating horizontal forces during human running. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999; 86(5):1657-62. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1657. View

4.
de Wit B, De Clercq D, Aerts P . Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running. J Biomech. 2000; 33(3):269-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00192-x. View

5.
Jones A, Carter H . The effect of endurance training on parameters of aerobic fitness. Sports Med. 2000; 29(6):373-86. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200029060-00001. View