» Articles » PMID: 36837779

Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Metabolites
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Feb 25
PMID 36837779
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a common and deadly brain tumor with late diagnoses and poor prognoses. Machine learning (ML) is an emerging tool that can create highly accurate diagnostic and prognostic prediction models. This paper aimed to systematically search the literature on ML for GBM metabolism and assess recent advancements. A literature search was performed using predetermined search terms. Articles describing the use of an ML algorithm for GBM metabolism were included. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis: diagnostic (n = 3, 30%), prognostic (n = 6, 60%), or both (n = 1, 10%). Most studies analyzed data from multiple databases, while 50% (n = 5) included additional original samples. At least 2536 data samples were run through an ML algorithm. Twenty-seven ML algorithms were recorded with a mean of 2.8 algorithms per study. Algorithms were supervised (n = 24, 89%), unsupervised (n = 3, 11%), continuous (n = 19, 70%), or categorical (n = 8, 30%). The mean reported accuracy and AUC of ROC were 95.63% and 0.779, respectively. One hundred six metabolic markers were identified, but only EMP3 was reported in multiple studies. Many studies have identified potential biomarkers for GBM diagnosis and prognostication. These algorithms show promise; however, a consensus on even a handful of biomarkers has not yet been made.

Citing Articles

Integrating machine learning with mendelian randomization for unveiling causal gene networks in glioblastoma multiforme.

Du L, Wang P, Qiu X, Li Z, Ma J, Chen P Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):38.

PMID: 39804431 PMC: 11730047. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01792-0.


Circulating Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Advances and Challenges.

Seyhan A Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(14).

PMID: 39063215 PMC: 11277426. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25147974.


Modeling of brain tumors using , and microfluidic models: A review of the current developments.

Raju R R, AlSawaftah N, Husseini G Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31402.

PMID: 38807869 PMC: 11130649. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31402.


Liquid biopsy: creating opportunities in brain space.

Trivedi R, Bhat K Br J Cancer. 2023; 129(11):1727-1746.

PMID: 37752289 PMC: 10667495. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02446-0.

References
1.
Waqar M, Trifiletti D, McBain C, OConnor J, Coope D, Akkari L . Early Therapeutic Interventions for Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Rationale and Review of the Literature. Curr Oncol Rep. 2022; 24(3):311-324. PMC: 8885508. DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01157-0. View

2.
Rudie J, Rauschecker A, Bryan R, Davatzikos C, Mohan S . Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Oncology. Radiology. 2019; 290(3):607-618. PMC: 6389268. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181928. View

3.
Floyd Jr C, Tourassi G . An artificial neural network for lesion detection on single-photon emission computed tomographic images. Invest Radiol. 1992; 27(9):667-72. DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199209000-00001. View

4.
Gollapalli K, Ray S, Srivastava R, Renu D, Singh P, Dhali S . Investigation of serum proteome alterations in human glioblastoma multiforme. Proteomics. 2012; 12(14):2378-90. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200002. View

5.
Sotoudeh H, Shafaat O, Bernstock J, Brooks M, Elsayed G, Chen J . Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Glioma: Era of Personalized Medicine. Front Oncol. 2019; 9:768. PMC: 6702305. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00768. View