» Articles » PMID: 22997542

RANDOM LASSO

Overview
Journal Ann Appl Stat
Date 2012 Sep 22
PMID 22997542
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We propose a computationally intensive method, the random lasso method, for variable selection in linear models. The method consists of two major steps. In step 1, the lasso method is applied to many bootstrap samples, each using a set of randomly selected covariates. A measure of importance is yielded from this step for each covariate. In step 2, a similar procedure to the first step is implemented with the exception that for each bootstrap sample, a subset of covariates is randomly selected with unequal selection probabilities determined by the covariates' importance. Adaptive lasso may be used in the second step with weights determined by the importance measures. The final set of covariates and their coefficients are determined by averaging bootstrap results obtained from step 2. The proposed method alleviates some of the limitations of lasso, elastic-net and related methods noted especially in the context of microarray data analysis: it tends to remove highly correlated variables altogether or select them all, and maintains maximal flexibility in estimating their coefficients, particularly with different signs; the number of selected variables is no longer limited by the sample size; and the resulting prediction accuracy is competitive or superior compared to the alternatives. We illustrate the proposed method by extensive simulation studies. The proposed method is also applied to a Glioblastoma microarray data analysis.

Citing Articles

A multigrained preference analysis method for product iterative design incorporating AI-generated review detection.

Su Z, Yang M, Zhai Q, Guo K, Huang Y, Cong Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2528.

PMID: 39833248 PMC: 11747264. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86551-5.


A network analysis of affective and motivational individual differences and error monitoring in a non-clinical sample.

Grabowska A, Sondej F, Senderecka M Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(10).

PMID: 39462813 PMC: 11513196. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae397.


CSER: a gene regulatory network construction method based on causal strength and ensemble regression.

Li Y, Du Y, Wang M, Ai D Front Genet. 2024; 15:1481787.

PMID: 39371416 PMC: 11449711. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1481787.


Biochar improves the nutrient cycle in sandy-textured soils and increases crop yield: a systematic review.

Bekchanova M, Campion L, Bruns S, Kuppens T, Lehmann J, Jozefczak M Environ Evid. 2024; 13(1):3.

PMID: 39294832 PMC: 11376106. DOI: 10.1186/s13750-024-00326-5.


Bring Out Your Dead: A Review of the Cost Minimisation Approach in Health Technology Assessment Submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee.

Tirrell Z, Norman A, Hoyle M, Lybrand S, Parkinson B Pharmacoeconomics. 2024; 42(11):1287-1300.

PMID: 39182009 PMC: 11499440. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-024-01420-9.


References
1.
Freije W, Castro-Vargas F, Fang Z, Horvath S, Cloughesy T, Liau L . Gene expression profiling of gliomas strongly predicts survival. Cancer Res. 2004; 64(18):6503-10. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0452. View

2.
Horvath S, Zhang B, Carlson M, Lu K, Zhu S, Felciano R . Analysis of oncogenic signaling networks in glioblastoma identifies ASPM as a molecular target. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103(46):17402-7. PMC: 1635024. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0608396103. View

3.
Xie Y, Chan H, Fan J, Chen Y, Young J, Li W . Involvement of visinin-like protein-1 (VSNL-1) in regulating proliferative and invasive properties of neuroblastoma. Carcinogenesis. 2007; 28(10):2122-30. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgm147. View

4.
Tatenhorst L, Senner V, Puttmann S, Paulus W . Regulators of G-protein signaling 3 and 4 (RGS3, RGS4) are associated with glioma cell motility. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2004; 63(3):210-22. DOI: 10.1093/jnen/63.3.210. View

5.
Park M, Hastie T . Penalized logistic regression for detecting gene interactions. Biostatistics. 2007; 9(1):30-50. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm010. View