» Articles » PMID: 36823317

Double Strand DNA Breaks in Sperm: the Bad Guy in the Crowd

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Feb 24
PMID 36823317
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of this opinion paper was to bring to light and enhance our understanding of the amount of double-strand DNA breaks in sperm and whether there is a threshold of no return when considering repair by the oocyte/embryo.

Methods: A brief review of literature related to the theories proposed for the appearance of double-strand breaks in human spermatozoa. Further commentary regarding their detection, how oocytes or embryos may deal with them, and what are the consequences if they are not repaired. Finally, a strategy for dealing with patients who have higher levels of double-strand DNA breaks in sperm is proposed by reviewing and presenting data using testicular extracted sperm.

Results: We propose a theory that a threshold may exist in the oocyte that allows either complete or partial DNA repair of impaired sperm. The closer that an embryo is exposed to the threshold, the more the effect on the ensuing embryo will fail to reach various milestones, including blastocyst stage, implantation, pregnancy loss, an adverse delivery outcome, or offspring health. We also present a summary of the role that testicular sperm extraction may play in improving outcomes for couples in which the male has a high double-strand DNA break level in his sperm.

Conclusions: Double-strand DNA breaks in sperm provide a greater stress on repair mechanisms and challenge the threshold of repair in oocytes. It is therefore imperative that we improve our understanding and diagnostic ability of sperm DNA, and in particular, how double-strand DNA breaks originate and how an oocyte or embryo is able to deal with them.

Citing Articles

The Potential of Superoxide Dismutase-Rich as a Promoter of Cellular Health.

Cocksedge S, Mantecon L, Castano E, Infante C, Bailey S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40004157 PMC: 11855123. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041693.


Cryopreservation of bovine sperm causes single-strand DNA breaks that are localized in the toroidal regions of chromatin.

Ribas-Maynou J, Muino R, Tamargo C, Yeste M J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024; 15(1):140.

PMID: 39394604 PMC: 11470689. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-024-01099-0.


Outcomes comparison of testicular versus ejaculated sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in infertile men with high DNA fragmentation: updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhao G, Jiang X, Zheng Y, Bai H, Jiang Z, Cheng S Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 12(12):1785-1802.

PMID: 38196694 PMC: 10772647. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-415.

References
1.
Vaughan D, Sakkas D . Sperm selection methods in the 21st century. Biol Reprod. 2019; 101(6):1076-1082. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/ioz032. View

2.
Ribas-Maynou J, Garcia-Peiro A, Abad C, Amengual M, Navarro J, Benet J . Alkaline and neutral Comet assay profiles of sperm DNA damage in clinical groups. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(3):652-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der461. View

3.
Greco E, Scarselli F, Iacobelli M, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Ferrero S . Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 2004; 20(1):226-30. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh590. View

4.
Parrella A, Keating D, Cheung S, Xie P, Stewart J, Rosenwaks Z . A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(10):2057-2066. PMC: 6823295. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01543-5. View

5.
Ben-Ami I, Raziel A, Strassburger D, Komarovsky D, Ron-El R, Friedler S . Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome of ejaculated versus extracted testicular spermatozoa in cryptozoospermic men. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(7):1867-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.025. View