» Articles » PMID: 26386468

Sperm Selection in Natural Conception: What Can We Learn from Mother Nature to Improve Assisted Reproduction Outcomes?

Overview
Date 2015 Sep 20
PMID 26386468
Citations 88
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In natural conception only a few sperm cells reach the ampulla or the site of fertilization. This population is a selected group of cells since only motile cells can pass through cervical mucus and gain initial entry into the female reproductive tract. In animals, some studies indicate that the sperm selected by the reproductive tract and recovered from the uterus and the oviducts have higher fertilization rates but this is not a universal finding. Some species show less discrimination in sperm selection and abnormal sperm do arrive at the oviduct. In contrast, assisted reproductive technologies (ART) utilize a more random sperm population. In this review we contrast the journey of the spermatozoon in vivo and in vitro and discuss this in the context of developing new sperm preparation and selection techniques for ART.

Methods: A review of the literature examining characteristics of the spermatozoa selected in vivo is compared with recent developments in in vitro selection and preparation methods. Contrasts and similarities are presented.

Results And Conclusions: New technologies are being developed to aid in the diagnosis, preparation and selection of spermatozoa in ART. To date progress has been frustrating and these methods have provided variable benefits in improving outcomes after ART. It is more likely that examining the mechanisms enforced by nature will provide valuable information in regard to sperm selection and preparation techniques in vitro. Identifying the properties of those spermatozoa which do reach the oviduct will also be important for the development of more effective tests of semen quality. In this review we examine the value of sperm selection to see how much guidance for ART can be gleaned from the natural selection processes in vivo.

Citing Articles

Porcine sperm bind to an oviduct glycan coupled to glass surfaces as a model of sperm interaction with the oviduct.

Soto-Heras S, Volz L, Bovin N, Miller D Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4680.

PMID: 39920342 PMC: 11806115. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88986-2.


Genome-Wide microRNA Expression Profiling in Human Spermatozoa and Its Relation to Sperm Quality.

Cassuto N, Boitrelle F, Mouik H, Larue L, Keromnes G, Ledee N Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(1.

PMID: 39858600 PMC: 11765444. DOI: 10.3390/genes16010053.


LH level on trigger day, number of follicles ≥16 mm but <18 mm, and number of retrieved oocytes are independent risk factors for polyspermy in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol.

Wu Q, He L Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15:1521734.

PMID: 39764246 PMC: 11701240. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1521734.


Applying an evolutionary perspective to assisted reproductive technologies.

Evans J, Garcia-Gonzalez F PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(12):pgae512.

PMID: 39691447 PMC: 11650523. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae512.


Exploring sperm cell motion dynamics: Insights from genetic algorithm-based analysis.

Klingner A, Kovalenko A, Magdanz V, Khalil I Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 23:2837-2850.

PMID: 39660215 PMC: 11630665. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.06.008.


References
1.
Fischer B, Adams C . Fertilization following mixed insemination with 'cervix-selected' and 'unselected' spermatozoa in the rabbit. J Reprod Fertil. 1981; 62(2):337-43. DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0620337. View

2.
Sanchez V, Redmann K, Wistuba J, Wubbeling F, Burger M, Oldenhof H . Oxidative DNA damage in human sperm can be detected by Raman microspectroscopy. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(5):1124-9.e1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1059. View

3.
Lehtonen J, Parker G . Gamete competition, gamete limitation, and the evolution of the two sexes. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014; 20(12):1161-8. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gau068. View

4.
. The clinical utility of sperm DNA integrity testing: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(3):673-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.049. View

5.
Tournaye H, Verheyen G, Albano C, Camus M, Van Landuyt L, Devroey P . Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis of the literature. Fertil Steril. 2002; 78(5):1030-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03377-0. View