» Articles » PMID: 31418108

A Treatment Approach for Couples with Disrupted Sperm DNA Integrity and Recurrent ART Failure

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Aug 17
PMID 31418108
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To test a novel method to select spermatozoa with high chromatin integrity.

Design: Specimens with high sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF) were selected by density gradient selection (DGS) and microfluidic sperm sorting (MSS).

Setting: Academic medical center.

Patient(s): Ejaculates from consenting men were processed by DGS/MSS. Couples underwent ICSI cycles with spermatozoa processed by DGS/MSS. Clinical outcomes were evaluated after embryo transfer.

Intervention(s): SCF was measured by TUNEL. ICSI with spermatozoa selected by DGS and MSS was performed.

Main Outcome Measure(s): Fertilization, embryo implantation, and pregnancy outcomes were compared between DGS and MSS.

Result(s): A total of 23 men had an average SCF of 20.7 ± 10%. After DGS and MSS, the SCF was 12.5 ± 5% and 1.8 ± 1%, respectively. In couples who underwent ICSI, the average SCF was 28.8 ± 9%, which fell to 21.0 ± 9% after DGS and 1.3 ± 0.7% after MSS. Four couples underwent 11 ICSI cycles with DGS and achieved one (25%) pregnancy that resulted in pregnancy loss. In four subsequent ICSI cycles with MSS, an ongoing clinical pregnancy rate of 50% was achieved. Five additional couples underwent 12 cycles of ICSI with DGS. After preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, 30.3% of the embryos were euploid. One pregnancy was achieved, resulting in pregnancy loss. With MSS, 31.5% of the embryos were euploid and 4 couples obtained a pregnancy. Finally, sixteen couples underwent 20 ICSI cycles solely with MSS at our center. Of these couples, 8 had failed 13 ICSI cycles with DGS elsewhere. These couples achieved an overall implantation of 34.5% (10/29) and a pregnancy rate of 58.8% (10/17).

Conclusion(s): Microfluidic selection yielded spermatozoa with optimal genomic integrity and improved chances of obtaining a euploid conceptus.

Citing Articles

Sperm Separation and Selection Techniques to Mitigate Sperm DNA Damage.

Fleming S, Morroll D, Nijs M Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003711 PMC: 11856810. DOI: 10.3390/life15020302.


The intricate "ART" of ICSI.

Kocur O, Xie P, Cheung S, Ng L, De Jesus A, Rosenwaks Z J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 42(2):349-365.

PMID: 39714737 PMC: 11871271. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03322-3.


Embryology outcomes of a device-based sperm separation technique compared to density gradient centrifugation using thawed spermatozoa-a sibling donor oocyte study.

Gavriil E, Desli A, Geladaris V, Kachpani E, Neofytou E, Tatsi P J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 42(1):97-105.

PMID: 39614958 PMC: 11805725. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03336-x.


Effect of Two Different Sperm Selection Methods on Boar Sperm Parameters and In Vitro Fertilisation Outcomes.

Serrano-Albal M, Aquilina M, Kiazim L, Zak L, Griffin D, Ellis P Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272329 PMC: 11394568. DOI: 10.3390/ani14172544.


Optimized sperm selection: a highly efficient device for the isolation of progressive motile sperm with low DNA fragmentation index.

Mateizel I, Racca A, Aligianni E, Distasi E, Baert Y, Segers I J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(8):2201-2209.

PMID: 38890266 PMC: 11339219. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03168-9.


References
1.
Zeyad A, Hamad M, Amor H, Hammadeh M . Relationships between bacteriospermia, DNA integrity, nuclear protamine alteration, sperm quality and ICSI outcome. Reprod Biol. 2018; 18(1):115-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.repbio.2018.01.010. View

2.
. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: evidence and evolution. Hum Reprod Update. 2007; 13(6):515-26. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmm024. View

3.
Irani M, ONeill C, Palermo G, Xu K, Zhang C, Qin X . Blastocyst development rate influences implantation and live birth rates of similarly graded euploid blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(1):95-102.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.03.032. View

4.
Gil M, Sar-Shalom V, Melendez Sivira Y, Carreras R, Checa M . Sperm selection using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013; 30(4):479-85. PMC: 3644127. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-013-9962-8. View

5.
Kang H . Programmed versus natural frozen embryo transfer: which is the best nest?. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(4):636-637. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.020. View