» Articles » PMID: 36813962

Essential Elements of Radical Pair Magnetosensitivity in Drosophila

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Feb 22
PMID 36813962
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many animals use Earth's magnetic field (also known as the geomagnetic field) for navigation. The favoured mechanism for magnetosensitivity involves a blue-light-activated electron-transfer reaction between flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) and a chain of tryptophan residues within the photoreceptor protein CRYPTOCHROME (CRY). The spin-state of the resultant radical pair, and therefore the concentration of CRY in its active state, is influenced by the geomagnetic field. However, the canonical CRY-centric radical-pair mechanism does not explain many physiological and behavioural observations. Here, using electrophysiology and behavioural analyses, we assay magnetic-field responses at the single-neuron and organismal levels. We show that the 52 C-terminal amino acid residues of Drosophila melanogaster CRY, lacking the canonical FAD-binding domain and tryptophan chain, are sufficient to facilitate magnetoreception. We also show that increasing intracellular FAD potentiates both blue-light-induced and magnetic-field-dependent effects on the activity mediated by the C terminus. High levels of FAD alone are sufficient to cause blue-light neuronal sensitivity and, notably, the potentiation of this response in the co-presence of a magnetic field. These results reveal the essential components of a primary magnetoreceptor in flies, providing strong evidence that non-canonical (that is, non-CRY-dependent) radical pairs can elicit magnetic-field responses in cells.

Citing Articles

Learned magnetic map cues and two mechanisms of magnetoreception in turtles.

Goforth K, Lohmann C, Gavin A, Henning R, Harvey A, Hinton T Nature. 2025; 638(8052):1015-1022.

PMID: 39939776 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08554-y.


Cryptochrome magnetoreception: Time course of photoactivation from non-equilibrium coarse-grained molecular dynamics.

Ramsay J, Schuhmann F, Solovyov I, Kattnig D Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2025; 26():58-69.

PMID: 39802491 PMC: 11725172. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.11.001.


Quantum theory of a potential biological magnetic field sensor: Radical pair mechanism in flavin adenine dinucleotide biradicals.

Sotoodehfar A, Rishabh , Zadeh-Haghighi H, Simon C Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 26:70-77.

PMID: 39697355 PMC: 11652833. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.11.032.


Spin Dynamics of Radical Pairs Using the Stochastic Schrödinger Equation in .

Pazera G, Fay T, Solovyov I, Hore P, Gerhards L J Chem Theory Comput. 2024; 20(19):8412-8421.

PMID: 39283312 PMC: 11465467. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00361.


A structural decryption of cryptochromes.

DeOliveira C, Crane B Front Chem. 2024; 12:1436322.

PMID: 39220829 PMC: 11362059. DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2024.1436322.


References
1.
Hore P, Mouritsen H . The Radical-Pair Mechanism of Magnetoreception. Annu Rev Biophys. 2016; 45:299-344. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-032116-094545. View

2.
Fedele G, Edwards M, Bhutani S, Hares J, Murbach M, Green E . Genetic analysis of circadian responses to low frequency electromagnetic fields in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10(12):e1004804. PMC: 4256086. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004804. View

3.
Giachello C, Scrutton N, Jones A, Baines R . Magnetic Fields Modulate Blue-Light-Dependent Regulation of Neuronal Firing by Cryptochrome. J Neurosci. 2016; 36(42):10742-10749. PMC: 5083005. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2140-16.2016. View

4.
Schwarze S, Schneider N, Reichl T, Dreyer D, Lefeldt N, Engels S . Weak Broadband Electromagnetic Fields are More Disruptive to Magnetic Compass Orientation in a Night-Migratory Songbird (Erithacus rubecula) than Strong Narrow-Band Fields. Front Behav Neurosci. 2016; 10:55. PMC: 4801848. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00055. View

5.
Gunther A, Einwich A, Sjulstok E, Feederle R, Bolte P, Koch K . Double-Cone Localization and Seasonal Expression Pattern Suggest a Role in Magnetoreception for European Robin Cryptochrome 4. Curr Biol. 2018; 28(2):211-223.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.003. View