» Articles » PMID: 36809435

Phantom-based Radiomics Feature Test-retest Stability Analysis on Photon-counting Detector CT

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Feb 22
PMID 36809435
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Radiomics image data analysis offers promising approaches in research but has not been implemented in clinical practice yet, partly due to the instability of many parameters. The aim of this study is to evaluate the stability of radiomics analysis on phantom scans with photon-counting detector CT (PCCT).

Methods: Photon-counting CT scans of organic phantoms consisting of 4 apples, kiwis, limes, and onions each were performed at 10 mAs, 50 mAs, and 100 mAs with 120-kV tube current. The phantoms were segmented semi-automatically and original radiomics parameters were extracted. This was followed by statistical analysis including concordance correlation coefficients (CCC), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), as well as random forest (RF) analysis, and cluster analysis to determine the stable and important parameters.

Results: Seventy-three of the 104 (70%) extracted features showed excellent stability with a CCC value > 0.9 when compared in a test and retest analysis, and 68 features (65.4%) were stable compared to the original in a rescan after repositioning. Between the test scans with different mAs values, 78 (75%) features were rated with excellent stability. Eight radiomics features were identified that had an ICC value greater than 0.75 in at least 3 of 4 groups when comparing the different phantoms in a phantom group. In addition, the RF analysis identified many features that are important for distinguishing the phantom groups.

Conclusion: Radiomics analysis using PCCT data provides high feature stability on organic phantoms, which may facilitate the implementation of radiomics analysis likewise in clinical routine.

Key Points: • Radiomics analysis using photon-counting computed tomography provides high feature stability. • Photon-counting computed tomography may pave the way for implementation of radiomics analysis in clinical routine.

Citing Articles

Value of Ultrahigh-Resolution Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography in Cardiac Imaging.

Kravchenko D, Hagar M, Vecsey-Nagy M, Tremamunno G, Szilveszter B, Vattay B Echocardiography. 2025; 42(2):e70100.

PMID: 39945196 PMC: 11822751. DOI: 10.1111/echo.70100.


Robustness of radiomics within photon-counting detector CT: impact of acquisition and reconstruction factors.

Zhang H, Lu T, Wang L, Xing Y, Hu Y, Xu Z Eur Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39890616 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11374-x.


Recent trends in scientific research in chest radiology: What to do or not to do? That is the critical question in research.

Hatabu H, Yanagawa M, Yamada Y, Hino T, Yamasaki Y, Hata A Jpn J Radiol. 2025; .

PMID: 39815124 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-025-01735-3.


The potential of photon-counting CT for the improved precision of lung nodule radiomics.

McCabe C, Abadi E, Zarei M, Segars P, Segars W, Samei E Phys Med Biol. 2025; 70(3).

PMID: 39813810 PMC: 11866323. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/adaad2.


Interrelation of pericoronary adipose tissue texture and coronary artery disease of the left coronary artery in cardiac photon-counting computed tomography.

Kahmann J, Norenberg D, Papavassiliu T, Schoenberg S, Froelich M, Ayx I Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1499219.

PMID: 39703885 PMC: 11656310. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1499219.


References
1.
Gillies R, Kinahan P, Hricak H . Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2015; 278(2):563-77. PMC: 4734157. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. View

2.
van Griethuysen J, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V . Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. Cancer Res. 2017; 77(21):e104-e107. PMC: 5672828. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339. View

3.
Huang Y, Liu Z, He L, Chen X, Pan D, Ma Z . Radiomics Signature: A Potential Biomarker for the Prediction of Disease-Free Survival in Early-Stage (I or II) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Radiology. 2016; 281(3):947-957. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152234. View

4.
Woznicki P, Westhoff N, Huber T, Riffel P, Froelich M, Gresser E . Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Characterization: Combined Use of Radiomics Model with PI-RADS and Clinical Parameters. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(7). PMC: 7407326. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12071767. View

5.
Xie T, Wang X, Li M, Tong T, Yu X, Zhou Z . Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a radiomics nomogram outperforms clinical model and TNM staging for survival estimation after curative resection. Eur Radiol. 2020; 30(5):2513-2524. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06600-2. View