» Articles » PMID: 39048741

Robustness of Radiomics Among Photon-counting Detector CT and Dual-energy CT Systems: a Texture Phantom Study

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2024 Jul 24
PMID 39048741
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the robustness of radiomics features among photon-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) and dual-energy CT (DECT) systems.

Methods: A texture phantom consisting of twenty-eight materials was scanned with one PCD-CT and four DECT systems (dual-source, rapid kV-switching, dual-layer, and sequential scanning) at three dose levels twice. Thirty sets of virtual monochromatic images at 70 keV were reconstructed. Regions of interest were delineated for each material with a rigid registration. Ninety-three radiomics were extracted per PyRadiomics. The test-retest repeatability between repeated scans was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. The intra-system reproducibility between dose levels, and inter-system reproducibility within the same dose level, were evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Inter-system variability among five scanners was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) and quartile coefficient of dispersion (QCD).

Results: The test-retest repeatability analysis presented that 97.1% of features were repeatable between scan-rescans. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.945 ± 0.079 and 0.945 ± 0.079 for intra-system reproducibility, respectively, and 86.0% and 85.7% of features were with ICC > 0.90 and CCC > 0.90, respectively, between different dose levels. The mean ± standard deviation ICC and CCC were 0.157 ± 0.174 and 0.157 ± 0.174 for inter-system reproducibility, respectively, and none of the features were with ICC > 0.90 or CCC > 0.90 within the same dose level. The inter-system variability suggested that 6.5% and 12.8% of features were with CV < 10% and QCD < 10%, respectively, among five CT systems.

Conclusion: The radiomics features were non-reproducible with significant variability in values among different CT techniques.

Clinical Relevance Statement: Radiomics features are non-reproducible with significant variability in values among photon-counting detector CT and dual-energy CT systems, necessitating careful attention to improve the cross-system generalizability of radiomic features before implementation of radiomics analysis in clinical routine.

Key Points: CT radiomics stability should be guaranteed before the implementation in the clinical routine. Radiomics robustness was on a low level among photon-counting detectors and dual-energy CT techniques. Limited inter-system robustness of radiomic features may impact the generalizability of models.

References
1.
Volpe S, Mastroleo F, Krengli M, Jereczek-Fossa B . Quo vadis Radiomics? Bibliometric analysis of 10-year Radiomics journey. Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(10):6736-6745. PMC: 10110486. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09645-6. View

2.
Zwanenburg A, Vallieres M, Abdalah M, Aerts H, Andrearczyk V, Apte A . The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. Radiology. 2020; 295(2):328-338. PMC: 7193906. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020191145. View

3.
Feng C, Chen R, Dong S, Deng W, Lin S, Zhu X . Predicting coronary plaque progression with conventional plaque parameters and radiomics features derived from coronary CT angiography. Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(12):8513-8520. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09809-4. View

4.
Kocak B, Baessler B, Cuocolo R, Mercaldo N, Pinto Dos Santos D . Trends and statistics of artificial intelligence and radiomics research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, and Medical Imaging: bibliometric analysis. Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(11):7542-7555. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09772-0. View

5.
Kocak B, Chepelev L, Chu L, Cuocolo R, Kelly B, Seebock P . Assessment of RadiomIcS rEsearch (ARISE): a brief guide for authors, reviewers, and readers from the Scientific Editorial Board of European Radiology. Eur Radiol. 2023; 33(11):7556-7560. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09768-w. View