» Articles » PMID: 36731139

Proton FLASH Effects on Mouse Skin at Different Oxygen Tensions

Overview
Journal Phys Med Biol
Publisher IOP Publishing
Date 2023 Feb 2
PMID 36731139
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

. Irradiation at FLASH dose rates (>40 Gy s) has received great attention due to its reported normal tissue sparing effect. The FLASH effect was originally observed in electron irradiations but has since been shown to also occur with both photon and proton beams. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the tissue sparing at high dose rates, including effects involving oxygen, such as depletion of oxygen within the irradiated cells. In this study, we investigated the protective role of FLASH proton irradiation on the skin when varying the oxygen concentration.. Our double scattering proton system provided a 1.2 × 1.6 cmelliptical field at a dose rate of ∼130 Gy s. The conventional dose rate was ∼0.4 Gy s. The legs of the FVB/N mice were marked with two tattooed dots and fixed in a holder for exposure. To alter the skin oxygen concentration, the mice were breathing pure oxygen or had their legs tied to restrict blood flow. The distance between the two dots was measured to analyze skin contraction over time.. FLASH irradiation mitigated skin contraction by 15% compared to conventional dose rate irradiation. The epidermis thickness and collagen deposition at 75 d following 25 to 30 Gy exposure suggested a long-term protective function in the skin from FLASH irradiation. Providing the mice with oxygen or reducing the skin oxygen concentration removed the dose-rate-dependent difference in response.e. FLASH proton irradiation decreased skin contraction, epidermis thickness and collagen deposition compared to standard dose rate irradiations. The observed oxygen-dependence of the FLASH effect is consistent with, but not conclusive of, fast oxygen depletion during the exposure.

Citing Articles

FLASH Radiotherapy: Benefits, Mechanisms, and Obstacles to Its Clinical Application.

Alhaddad L, Osipov A, Leonov S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684218 PMC: 11641130. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312506.


Major contributors to FLASH sparing efficacy emerge from murine skin studies: dose rate, total dose per fraction, anesthesia and oxygenation.

Pogue B, Thomas W, Tavakkoli A, Jarvis L, Hoopes P Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1414584.

PMID: 39525619 PMC: 11544430. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1414584.


Examining the Occurrence of the FLASH Effect in Animal Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ultra-High Dose Rate Proton or Carbon Ion Irradiation.

Wu X, Luo H, Wang Q, Du T, Chen Y, Tan M Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 23:15330338241289990.

PMID: 39512217 PMC: 11544673. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241289990.


The oxygen puzzle in FLASH radiotherapy: A comprehensive review and experimental outlook.

Scarmelotto A, Delprat V, Michiels C, Lucas S, Heuskin A Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024; 49:100860.

PMID: 39381632 PMC: 11458961. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100860.


Dose Rate Effects from the 1950s through to the Era of FLASH.

Held K, McNamara A, Daartz J, Bhagwat M, Rothwell B, Schuemann J Radiat Res. 2024; 202(2):161-176.

PMID: 38954556 PMC: 11426361. DOI: 10.1667/RADE-24-00024.1.


References
1.
Zhu H, Li J, Deng X, Qiu R, Wu Z, Zhang H . Modeling of cellular response after FLASH irradiation: a quantitative analysis based on the radiolytic oxygen depletion hypothesis. Phys Med Biol. 2021; 66(18). DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac226d. View

2.
Soto L, Casey K, Wang J, Blaney A, Manjappa R, Breitkreutz D . FLASH Irradiation Results in Reduced Severe Skin Toxicity Compared to Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation. Radiat Res. 2020; 194(6):618-624. PMC: 7855987. DOI: 10.1667/RADE-20-00090. View

3.
Montay-Gruel P, Acharya M, Goncalves Jorge P, Petit B, Petridis I, Fuchs P . Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an Effective Treatment against Glioblastoma that Reduces Neurocognitive Side Effects in Mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2020; 27(3):775-784. PMC: 7854480. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0894. View

4.
Mohyeldin A, Garzon-Muvdi T, Quinones-Hinojosa A . Oxygen in stem cell biology: a critical component of the stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2010; 7(2):150-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.007. View

5.
Kurokawa H, Ito H, Inoue M, Tabata K, Sato Y, Yamagata K . High resolution imaging of intracellular oxygen concentration by phosphorescence lifetime. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:10657. PMC: 4464287. DOI: 10.1038/srep10657. View