» Articles » PMID: 3667911

Failure of Multiple Passages to Increase Chlamydial Recovery

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 1987 Oct 1
PMID 3667911
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Because of a previous publication indicating that increasing the number of blind passages to five resulted in a marked increase in Chlamydia trachomatis isolation rates, we evaluated a multiple-blind-passage system in vials. Cervical specimens from 119 pregnant women and 82 specimens from other sources were tested for chlamydial infection. The recovery rate for C. trachomatis was not markedly increased after the first blind passage. Thus, we conclude that multiple blind passages are not necessary to maximize the C. trachomatis isolation rate in a vial system.

Citing Articles

Improved isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis from a low-prevalence population by using polyethylene glycol.

Gibson J, Egerer R, Wiedbrauk D J Clin Microbiol. 1993; 31(2):292-5.

PMID: 8432814 PMC: 262752. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.2.292-295.1993.


Sensitive detection and typing of Chlamydia trachomatis using nested polymerase chain reaction.

Frost E, Deslandes S, BOURGAUX-RAMOISY D Genitourin Med. 1993; 69(4):290-4.

PMID: 7721291 PMC: 1195090. DOI: 10.1136/sti.69.4.290.


Quantitation of Chlamydia trachomatis by culture, direct immunofluorescence and competitive polymerase chain reaction.

Frost E, Deslandes S, BOURGAUX-RAMOISY D, BOURGAUX P Genitourin Med. 1995; 71(4):239-43.

PMID: 7590716 PMC: 1195521. DOI: 10.1136/sti.71.4.239.


Susceptibility testing of Chlamydia trachomatis: from eggs to monoclonal antibodies.

Ehret J, Judson F Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988; 32(9):1295-9.

PMID: 3058015 PMC: 175854. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.32.9.1295.


Effect of differences in specimen processing and passage technique on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Jones R, Van Der Pol B, Katz B J Clin Microbiol. 1989; 27(5):894-8.

PMID: 2745697 PMC: 267450. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.27.5.894-898.1989.


References
1.
Stamm W, Harrison H, ALEXANDER E, Cles L, Spence M, Quinn T . Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections by direct immunofluorescence staining of genital secretions. A multicenter trial. Ann Intern Med. 1984; 101(5):638-41. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-5-638. View

2.
Schachter J, Hanna L, Hill E, Massad S, SHEPPARD C, Conte Jr J . Are chlamydial infections the most prevalent venereal disease?. JAMA. 1975; 231(12):1252-5. View

3.
Yoder B, Stamm W, Koester C, ALEXANDER E . Microtest procedure for isolation of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 1981; 13(6):1036-9. PMC: 273945. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.13.6.1036-1039.1981. View

4.
Schachter J, Stoner E, Moncada J . Screening for chlamydial infections in women attending family planning clinics. West J Med. 1983; 138(3):375-9. PMC: 1021473. View

5.
Jones R, Katz B, Van Der Pol B, Caine V, Batteiger B, Newhall W . Effect of blind passage and multiple sampling on recovery of Chlamydia trachomatis from urogenital specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1986; 24(6):1029-33. PMC: 269092. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.24.6.1029-1033.1986. View