» Articles » PMID: 36656852

De Novo Protein Fold Design Through Sequence-independent Fragment Assembly Simulations

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Jan 19
PMID 36656852
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

De novo protein design generally consists of two steps, including structure and sequence design. Many protein design studies have focused on sequence design with scaffolds adapted from native structures in the PDB, which renders novel areas of protein structure and function space unexplored. We developed FoldDesign to create novel protein folds from specific secondary structure (SS) assignments through sequence-independent replica-exchange Monte Carlo (REMC) simulations. The method was tested on 354 non-redundant topologies, where FoldDesign consistently created stable structural folds, while recapitulating on average 87.7% of the SS elements. Meanwhile, the FoldDesign scaffolds had well-formed structures with buried residues and solvent-exposed areas closely matching their native counterparts. Despite the high fidelity to the input SS restraints and local structural characteristics of native proteins, a large portion of the designed scaffolds possessed global folds completely different from natural proteins in the PDB, highlighting the ability of FoldDesign to explore novel areas of protein fold space. Detailed data analyses revealed that the major contributions to the successful structure design lay in the optimal energy force field, which contains a balanced set of SS packing terms, and REMC simulations, which were coupled with multiple auxiliary movements to efficiently search the conformational space. Additionally, the ability to recognize and assemble uncommon super-SS geometries, rather than the unique arrangement of common SS motifs, was the key to generating novel folds. These results demonstrate a strong potential to explore both structural and functional spaces through computational design simulations that natural proteins have not reached through evolution.

Citing Articles

AI Prediction of Structural Stability of Nanoproteins Based on Structures and Residue Properties by Mean Pooled Dual Graph Convolutional Network.

Li D, Zhu Y, Zhang W, Liu J, Yang X, Liu Z Interdiscip Sci. 2024; 17(1):101-113.

PMID: 39367992 DOI: 10.1007/s12539-024-00662-7.


MoDAFold: a strategy for predicting the structure of missense mutant protein based on AlphaFold2 and molecular dynamics.

Zheng L, Shi S, Sun X, Lu M, Liao Y, Zhu S Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(2).

PMID: 38305456 PMC: 10835750. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae006.


Peptides of a Feather: How Computation Is Taking Peptide Therapeutics under Its Wing.

Kazmirchuk T, Bradbury-Jost C, Withey T, Gessese T, Azad T, Samanfar B Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(6).

PMID: 37372372 PMC: 10298604. DOI: 10.3390/genes14061194.


Sticking to the Subject: Multifunctionality in Microbial Adhesins.

Lipke P, Ragonis-Bachar P J Fungi (Basel). 2023; 9(4).

PMID: 37108873 PMC: 10144551. DOI: 10.3390/jof9040419.

References
1.
Zheng W, Li Y, Zhang C, Zhou X, Pearce R, Bell E . Protein structure prediction using deep learning distance and hydrogen-bonding restraints in CASP14. Proteins. 2021; 89(12):1734-1751. PMC: 8616857. DOI: 10.1002/prot.26193. View

2.
Huang P, Feldmeier K, Parmeggiani F, Fernandez Velasco D, Hocker B, Baker D . De novo design of a four-fold symmetric TIM-barrel protein with atomic-level accuracy. Nat Chem Biol. 2015; 12(1):29-34. PMC: 4684731. DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.1966. View

3.
Silva D, Yu S, Ulge U, Spangler J, Jude K, Labao-Almeida C . De novo design of potent and selective mimics of IL-2 and IL-15. Nature. 2019; 565(7738):186-191. PMC: 6521699. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0830-7. View

4.
Zhang Y, Skolnick J . Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality. Proteins. 2004; 57(4):702-10. DOI: 10.1002/prot.20264. View

5.
Yang J, Yan R, Roy A, Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y . The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods. 2014; 12(1):7-8. PMC: 4428668. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3213. View